this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
118 points (98.4% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
53843 readers
574 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
💰 Please help cover server costs.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you're familiar with What.CD and its shutdown, the power users and their local copy of that music archive moved over to redacted.ch (stats) and orpheus.network (stats). They're private torrent trackers so they're invite-only, but TMK they both still offer interviewing as an entry option: RED, OPS. The interviews mostly consist of technical audio information and private tracker rules. The main downside is that these trackers expect you to seed an equal amount back, so you don't get a free pass to download everything without limits. Of the two, Orpheus is a lot easier to maintain "ratio" on since it gives you incremental credit just for having a large seedbase (even if no one is downloading from you). Ideally you should be on both if you're serious about music collecting, but these days they are largely just mirrors of each other.
If you don't want to get dirty in the private tracker world, I'd recommend Soulseek and RuTracker.
I'm just not confident that I'd be able to pass an interview with either of them. No issue with rules or ratios, I simply don't have enough time to study up on the technicals. I used to be on a decent tracker years ago, but didn't pay enough attention when they shut down and missed out on the open invites.
I've tried RuTracker in the past but it hasn't worked very well for me so far. Soulseek sounds interesting, especially if they get a Lidarr integration working.
It's really not that bad, both interviews are nearly identical, and both sites provide all the study material necessary. If you really want to get sneaky, you an look up the questions in advance. You get a reasonable time to answer, and an unlimited number of attempts. OPS I passed immediately, RED failed me the first time but passed the second. 50-60% of the answers I had no clue about before reading the study material. The worst part is waiting for an interviewer / the queue to get a test, but they've got systems to keep your place in queue as well.