Linux

47224 readers

859 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

XBPS has spoiled me - advice needed. (lemm.ee)

submitted 10 months ago by Charlatan@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of the few things that differentiates the major distros is the package manager. I've been running void on my laptop for the last 3 years and love it. XBPS is super fast and easy to use. It has never left me with a broken system either. That said, I've got the itch to switch.

I am looking at rolling / up to date distros. I'm inclined to use CLI when available.

I've been considering Opensuse, but last time I used zypper it was painfully slow. Has it gotten any better?

I was thinking of trying Alpine, how is APK?

Not interested in *butu, but apt seemed okay.

What's your favorite and how does it behave?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dotdev@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Went with Arch and Fedora simply for the parallel downloading. I tried xbps , the only turn off for me was the fact that feature was missing otherwise void is best to stick with.

[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You know pacman has parallel download support right? I'm pretty sure it's at 3 by default.

[–] accidental@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

Interesting fact! If you've had an arch machine for a while, it's possible you didn't know that parallel download support is available, because it's a config option hidden in pacman conf.pacnew (I know I didn't realize it until months after, lol).

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman#Enabling_parallel_downloads

load more comments (3 replies)