this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
173 points (97.8% liked)

Apple

17238 readers
156 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] B0rax@feddit.de 58 points 10 months ago (22 children)

TL:DR: they don‘t accept offsetting carbon emissions. By that logic, one watch has emitted between 7 and 12kg of CO2.

Note from my side: driving a combustion engine car emits between 100-200g per CO2 per km. So driving 70km in your car, will equal one Apple Watch.

So it is still quite impressive how low the value for the Apple Watch is, but it is not neutral.

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (17 children)

I'm confused on what the EU is going for here. When I read "carbon neutral" I assume that means minimized emissions + carbon offsets.

I'm not sure if "zero carbon" is even a thing but it sounds like that is what EU wants "carbon neutral" to mean?

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago (8 children)

If I kill your dog but give you a new one I don't think I could be described as "dog neutral"

[–] regnskog@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This isn’t a great metaphor. My dog is a singular individual and another dog isn’t my dog, so you can’t represent it with numbers. A carbon molecule is equivalent to another carbon molecule and can be abstracted.

That said, carbon credits sure seems like making up numbers to make something bad look better, just not in this way.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Except one CO2 molecule trapped in a stable environment, like underground coal, or natural oil reserve, is absolutely not equivalent to some other CO2 molecule in a far less stable environment, like artificially replanted forests.

I actually liked my dog metaphor specifically because of just like one dog isn't comparable to another, the carbon trade is turning stable CO2 into CO2 that might be released back into the atmosphere fairly quickly

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)