this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
1800 points (97.5% liked)

memes

9658 readers
3753 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (26 children)

Yeah, but that argument was compelling in 2005.

With storage as cheap as it is nowadays, a 15 MB FLAC audio file vs. a 3 MB MP3 really doesn't matter anymore. Those 12 MB cost nothing to store.

And to be honest, in cases where storage does matter, a 320 kbps MP3 is just a waste of space. A VBR MP3 with average bitrate around 200 kbps makes way more sense and nobody can tell the difference between that and 320 kbps in a double blind test.

So just maintain FLAC or other lossless for sharing music and transcode down when needed.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (14 children)

This is my take as well. Storage is cheap. I have thousands of albums and about 40,000 tracks currently and it consumes about 400GB. It's really not that much storage, considering.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (12 children)

So you don't listen to music unless you're at home? Or do you choose a subset of your library to put on your phone? That would be terribly annoying for me.

[–] apochryphal_triptych@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In my case, a self hosted streaming server works wonders. Plex with Pleaxamp, Jellyfin, Navidrome, Airsonic, any of them will stream to your phone while out and about.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That will work great if you live your entire life in cities.

I spend a lot of time in places with no cell service.

[–] apochryphal_triptych@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I live in the rural midwest with spotty cell service. All of those services support manual offline syncing to store music on your phone. I set Plexamp to stream lossy over cellular, and it doesn't take long to cache an entire playlist when I do have a signal.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So then you're back to the problem where you require more storage than what your phone has.

[–] apochryphal_triptych@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What problem? 200 tracks times 4mb/track equals 1Gb. If you can't spare a couple gigs of storage, you need to delete some apps off your phone.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The guy said he has 400gb of music, that's what we were talking about

[–] apochryphal_triptych@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And I said offline syncing a playlist (1-2Gb), not 400Gb. Max 1-2Gb. I have 1.8Tb of music that I can stream in the rural midwest at any given moment providing I have a signal, and about 3Gb synced to my phone when I don't have a signal. Plex is smart enough to buffer the next few song in your playback queue so it will play seamlessly through bad cellular coverage. Spotify and Tidal work the same way. Is selecting a subset of Spotify's catalog annoying?

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've never used those streaming services and that's literally one of the reasons why. You're back to the same problem.

[–] apochryphal_triptych@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I don’t know what to tell you then. 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)