this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
20 points (83.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43124 readers
1681 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After moving here from lemmy.world after learning of their view on federation with Threads, I now face a dilemma which I do not have a clear answer to.

Should I continue contributing to my niche communities on Instances federating with Threads, or build similar communities on other Instances blocking Threads?

I have a feeing this issue is not a one off, but a common one going forward, so it’s better to settle it once and for all. Below is my thought so far. What would you do in my case?

I love to post or comment on my favourite niche communities to share my experience with others and grow them. Those communities are small in size and they usually exist in certain instances only.

One one hand, having everyone in the same place would be much more beneficial since the community is not split and spread across the fediverse. We would also have better discussions with people from different background and diverse point of views.

On the other hand, I do not feel my contribution is in the right place anymore, if let’s say I post on lemmy.world. I don’t want Threads to benefit from my posts/comments and I want people to join Lemmy. Why would Threads users join Lemmy if they could subsribe to our communities?

I wish my communities were instance-independent so this barrier can be removed. I can create a similar community here but it is the last thing I would want to do.

Having written all these down, I realised this was exactly the same situation how I came to Lemmy from reddit, i.e. communities split across Internet due to issues we have with the platform/instance we are on. I guess discussion on platform/instance-independent communities can be a topic of its own

Edit: formatting and clarified my points and updated my question to reflect that

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mancy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Please ELI5 for idiots like me. What’s the problem now with lemmy.world?

[–] tenth@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

They will federate with Threads. If I continue posting on lemmy.world, Threads will benefit from it and Threads users would never join Lemmy because they could subscribe to our communities. But I also don’t want to split my niche communities

[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be clear, lemmy.world isn't federating with Threads. They're taking the wait-and-see approach, which means that they'll make that decision later.

I'm not happy with that decision, but it is distinctly different from saying that they will federate with Threads.

[–] tenth@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

According to Lemmy documentation, if they don't block a server, it means they are federating (aka talking using ActivityPub protocol) with that server.

Lemmy has three types of federation:

  • Allowlist: Explicitly list instances to connect to.
  • BlockList: Explicitly list instances to not connect to. Federation is open to all other instances.
  • Open: Federate with all potential instances.

Federation is enabled by default.

It means Meta could in theory talking right now with instances not blocking them as part of their testing.

I don't know why they could not just block in the first place, then unblock/allow later if it makes sense.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)