Technology

59086 readers

3746 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

285

Google will now make passkeys the default for personal accounts (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Tibert@jlai.lu to c/technology@lemmy.world

189 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Passkey is some sort of specific unique key to a device allowing to use a pin on a device instead of the password. But which won't work on another device.

Now I don't know if that key can be stolen or not, or if it's really more secure or not, as people have really unsecure pins.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Nope. Not going to have my entire digital everything depend on me not losing or breaking a single electronic device.

[–] synthsalad@mycelial.nexus 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From Ricky Mondello, who works on passkeys at Apple: “If it’s device-bound, it’s not a passkey”:

https://hachyderm.io/@rmondello/111188643228872151

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a terrible take ... He's confusing "what it does and how it works" with "how you manage it".

It's like saying "don't call it a password if you write it down". It's confusing and unhelpful.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it's literally in the spec. Passkeys are designed for cross device synchronization. You have to go out of your way to make it local only (or use a different webauthn spec like physical security keys)

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're just private keys. By nature you can copy them wherever you want. I guess I don't know why he's making that distinction at all.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

The original spec is resident keys including TPM protected or hardware token protected keys designed to be impossible to copy. That's why there's a distinction.

load more comments (19 replies)