LibreWolf

2965 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the official community for LibreWolf.

LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. If you have any question please visit our FAQ first: https://librewolf.net/docs/faq/

To learn more or to download the browser visit the website: https://librewolf.net/

If you want to contribute head over to our Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/librewolf

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
51
 
 

Hi, it's very strange, I found your page with posts and it said 1.5k subscribers, and when I joined I am presented with an empty community (0 subscribers) and no posts. I checked many times that I am in the right place so maybe I did something else wrong?

52
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mefinity@lemmy.sdf.org to c/librewolf@lemmy.ml
 
 

Coming from Fedora to Debian Sid
Now Firefox Sync doesnt work

Update: I also cannot install addons via addons.mozilla.org
After tinkering around i noticed the browser's useragent is set to display as Netscape on Linux, which is strange

I have turned general.useragent.compatMode.firefox to true via about:config and it seems to work, i can use Firefox Sync and use addons now

53
 
 

Hey! I'm new to LibreWolf and before I was using Vivaldi's mouse gestures for long enough that they are hard coded into my brain. Problem is that the mouse gestures I'm using now (Gesturefy) doesn't work on new tabs since all extension are disabled there by default.

I'm assuming it's possible to give permissions for the extension through overrides.cfg, but this is where my technical abilities end. What do I need to add to the .cfg to make Gesturefy work on all types of tabs?

54
 
 

Librewolf is great, but now some stupid sites require chromium-based browsers to work. E.g: Microsoft teams.

  • Ungoogled chromium? problem is that it's worse in fingerprinting compared to Brave. See: https://privacytests.org/
  • Brave: bloated and filled with unnecessary features.

Why isn't there a Brave fork yet that gets rid of the crypto junk?

55
 
 

Linux has now hit 3% according to sat counter. It isn't has obscure as it was in the past and I think it is a lot less of a privacy risk.

I also know a significant number of Linux users who use librewolf. This means that the user share might be a bit higher

56
 
 

Is this also present on Librewolf? Or is it removed?

I don't like someone having remote control over what I'm using, and this seems to have some of it, according to Bug 1832791 - Add to AMRemoteSettings support for quarantinedDomains RemoteSettings entries.

If not removed completely, perhaps it can be a default config option on Librewolf, taking advantage on the opt-out made available through extensions.quarantinedDomains.enabled.

I don't know the implications on "security" by opting out, but for sure I don't want any of my chosen privacy extensions to be shut down for any specific site, even if it's not monitored by FF or whatever. Also, who decides what's insecure for which sites? Is there a Librewolf say about this "feature"?

More about it from Firefox 115 can silently remotely disable my extension on any site.

Edit:

Two issues were filed about this (already closed), Should allowing FF remote control over extensions (restricted ones) be disabled by default on Librewolf , and some work before v115, which are fixed on 115.0.1-2, through commit 2c561ca85dbf791d83da41ffab829afca8b19323, but not yet fixed on 115.0.1-1...

57
 
 

I am a new user to Librewolf and am curious about the community's thoughts on DNS over HTTPS in the browser.

58
 
 

Hi all, just a simple question: Why Librewolf is not packaged in Debian? It's a pity I have to add external repos or run the appimage. Cheers!