To call Zelenskyy “President Putin” at that critical moment was offensive and totally unacceptable.
I think it was funnier
To call Zelenskyy “President Putin” at that critical moment was offensive and totally unacceptable.
I think it was funnier
A right wing nationalist movement of the past that supported a monarchy
You have no clue what you’re talking about. The monarchy was already leading, and the movement was aimed at combating the brutal imperialist exploitation of China, so was objectively progressive. Nationalism can be both a good (progressive) and bad (regressive) thing depending on the situation (development of the nation, relationship with other countries, etc.). Using right-wing in this sense is strange, because we could argue numerous historically progressive movements were “right wing” by today’s standards, it means nothing.
A corporate-controlled genocidal fascist who's incapable of speaking is the ideal leader under liberalism. Saying mean things destroys democracyTM.
Can you actually explain the difference between the options and reconcile the fact that Hillary and the DNC purposefully elevated Trump behind the scenes (entire "lesser evil" rationale is a farce)? Thx!
It’s like I’m talking to a character in Disco Elysium who has two preprogrammed responses and maybe a third if I forget to wear a shirt. Completely off in your own world huffing nasal spray.
I’m arguing the U.S. is no less psychopathic and countries need protection from Western imperialism.
The US was the one that initiated it regardless, and I think China and Russia’s support for UN sanctions on Iran was incorrect.
Saddam used chemical weapons on Iran and the U.S. helped him. Would you actually want a country like that to have nukes?
And the sanctions regime that brought Iran to the table in the first place was very difficult to forge, so that won't be duplicated ever again.
Oh that’s awful it was so difficult to forge your apparatus for terrorizing the Iranian people.
LMAO LMAO LMAO