bug

joined 1 year ago
[–] bug@lemmy.one 7 points 11 months ago

@jonah@lemmy.one you're alive! Welcome back, this server needs 4 months worth of maintenance!

[–] bug@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not about being a hassle to maintain, it's about users thinking they were sending secure messages when they weren't. The simplest explanation is that Signal is a secure messenger, so the app shouldn't let you send insecure messages. I'm sure it lost them a few users but they're not trying to gain maximum market share like for-profit orgs try to.

[–] bug@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

I've tried playing various Zelda games over the years but I've just never got into any of them. I've just started WWHD and it seems to suffer from the classic Zelda problem of having one very specific solution to a puzzle blocking off all progress, and not telling you at all where that puzzle/solution is if you haven't already identified it! Also it tempted me with an open ocean of sailing and gave me some side-quest maps to follow, then when I tried to follow them it immediately turned me around and said "you can't go this way yet"!

[–] bug@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

They've updated their 'policy', still with no accrual explanation that I can see:

The admin team updated the communities that they will allow archive links to be used.

[–] bug@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

No idea what the deleted comment you replied to said, but I'm a big fan of bringing the word "dork" back!

[–] bug@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Articons seems to still have it

[–] bug@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I've wanted to pay FTL on a touchscreen for years

[–] bug@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the very thing to motivate you to ditch your gmail account, don't let them hold you hostage!

[–] bug@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

The Nexus legacy lives on!

 

I know they've been around since the GDPR came into effect, but I've suddenly noticed a sharp increase in the cookie prompts on web pages which have a second "legitimate interest" page. Some of these have an "object all" button, but plenty require you to manually opt-out of sometimes hundreds of ad-trackers.

The cynic in me assumes this is a legal loophole, whereby they can claim legitimate interest in your data in order to do exactly what they were going to do anyway (which is not what the legitimate interest feature of the GDPR is for) without being required to give you a "reject all" button.

  1. Am I being overly paranoid or is this exactly what's happening?
  2. Does blocking all third-party cookies (something your browser should be able to do by default) negate all this need to reject anyway?
  3. If not then what's the solution?

If you do have an answer then please state if it applies to EU/UK or other, non-GDPR-respecting countries!

[–] bug@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess it makes complete sense for these "live service" games, but it's so weird to me that the game itself changes and you lose access to something you might already have paid for!

[–] bug@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that they're your whole life is the problem. You'll understand when you grow up.

[–] bug@lemmy.one 76 points 1 year ago

Can we move away from the habit of just copy-pasting clickbait video titles with no information as to what they're actually about? Lemmy gives you a description field, you have the power to summarise videos which should really be blog posts!

 

I've recently changed from dns.adguard.com to extended.dns.mullvad.net as it generally seems more privacy friendly, but it seemed to go dead for a while today. Anyone else see this or was it a me problem? I can deal with a slightly flaky service but I can't recommend one to non-techies who just need a working adblocker.

 

I'm probably one of the few people still using a Pebble smart watch (still alive and kicking with Rebble!), and I've just gone through the app store and found a few cool apps that still work. Given that you have to give the Pebble android app quite a few permissions to be able to do its thing I'm now wondering if all the third-party apps can also access all those permissions. They're mostly little FOSS one-person projects so I can probably have a nose through the source myself to check for dodgy behaviour, but does anyone know what the risks are in general?

 

I've seen the post saying that the lead developer is stepping down, I've seen his accusations of abuse. I've seen enormous write-ups which make questionable claims about how he's the devil himself. I've seen a lot of rumour and hearsay, and now I've got no idea what to think.

Is anyone able to give a short, unbiased summary of what's going on? (Ultimately, from a selfish point of view, I want to know if the project is likely to fall apart or if this is just bickering between egos!)

view more: next ›