This is true in 5e DnD. Since this is "RPGMemes", and the meme applies to a lot more RPGs, including editions of DnD other than 5e.
Eagle0600
In D&D 5e. In other editions, that would have to be some kind of special ability or simply off the table altogether.
PF1E, too.
Scion (White Wolf). Maybe Eclipse Phase. Mutants and Masterminds.
I started my longest-running campaign with a "one-shot". Part of that was by the publishers' design. I ran the free module "We Be Goblins" (highly recommended), which involved a pack of goblins searching for more fireworks. The end of that adventure acts as a teaser for the "Jade Regent" adventure path, which I ran to completion with most of the initial group.
In that adventure path, the PCs get to revisit (and drive off) their tribe from the one-shot in the opening act.
There's never a legitimate reason for a statue to be inside a structure (as opposed to in a public square), unless you're in a temple or shrine to a friendly god and it's their statue.
That's only if you put a bag of holding into a portable hole (or is it the other way around?). Bags of holding can go inside each other just fine normally.
If we want to take this seriously, just for fun, then we need to first consider what "put the last bag inside the first" means. Bags of holding are openings into extradimensional spaces, effectively portals. Theoretically, I don't think there's any problem with extradimensional spaces containing portals to each other in a looped manner. The problem comes with the physical act of placing one bag inside the last. In order to do so, you'd need to have a way to teleport into a known extradimensional space without using the opening. I don't think there's a way to do that in any edition of DnD or Pathfinder, but I could be wrong. If you can, however, then you could use exactly the same technique to retrieve any of the bags and therefore open the loop again.
Thanks for replying!
This one isn't up on Socks and Puppets yet? Or is this an older one I've forgotten.
But nothing in the meme relies on it, so as a criticism of the meme it falls flat.