Candelestine

joined 1 year ago
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

... they can't find someone to come up with trivia questions worded in reverse word order? That's really not that hard.

Ooh! They should use ChatGPT!

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

I would describe it as a cacaphonic symphony that you eventually get used to. It packs as much information into one sense as you can get from your other four put together.

Much like how you can discern an individual instrument type in a symphony, sight lets you discern individual objects from afar, and gives you a mostly accurate summary of its basic properties.

Also much like with sound, it can be very appealing or unappealing, depending. There's an intrinsic beauty to the sense itself though. Every object has color, for instance, and color is more like smell. It can give you hints about what something is, but its mostly an arbitrary blend of different "flavors" that combine to create more complex examples.

It's the super-sense, the one sense that binds them all. When one of your other four detects something, your first instinct is to locate it with sight to determine more information before you do anything else. You "look at it" first. Almost without fail.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Problem with attacking stupidity is its not necessarily fixable. We do not attack people over things they cannot change, like the color of their skin or their sexual orientation.

How do they change their innate intelligence? We're not all gifted with the same amount. Can your system apply to someone who takes 5 minutes to learn the definition of even one new word? Someone who needed remedial classes, because the average classes were beyond their ability?

We need a system that allows for them too. So, asking for intelligence is asking too much, so that the execution of the method is easily within everyone's capabilities. Thus, back to the drawing board.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I agree, the cross-posting gets annoying. Why do people insist that everyone who is interested in a certain topic needs to participate in their post, so it has to go on every community?

People did not do that on reddit. They just made one post and waited for interaction.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does the purpose the data was collected for matter? Either the data is suitable or not. The motive of the pollsters who gathered it is irrelevant, isn't it?

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

It'd still irritate them due to the connotations, regardless of how legally actionable their irritation would be.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We'd just get a new one made out of water vapor. I'm sure everything would be fine.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You know, everyone should start calling the service twiX, just to irritate the candy bar company, which is actually a multi-billion dollar conglomerate that does care how its brands are perceived.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, it's not a fever. It's just sitting under a big pile of invisible blankets. Get rid of the blankets and things would be fine.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yet despite the clear creation of echo chambers, which I think is inevitable given how freedom of association works so smoothly and easily online, the Fediverse forces them all to "live next to each other".

It's not an entirely separate service I need to go on if I want to see what all the Nazi kids are up to these days.

This forced adjacency and inability to create any blocks stronger than defederation (which is pretty weak, really, compared to what other services can do) is going to have overall beneficial effects in the long-run, I think. Though it'll certainly cause its fair share of headaches too.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago

This is underrated. I actually close Lemmy a lot easier and more quickly than I did reddit, it's not hooking me with dopamine hits nearly as strongly.

As a result, since I know I'll probably just scroll for a few minutes at a time, I'm more willing to check in more often and toss a few upvotes and maybe a comment or two around.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

No, I don't think the brain really works that way, except in the very broadest sense.

view more: next ›