this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
-37 points (24.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43755 readers
1265 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems as though we are going backwards. We were doing so well in realising that all human beings are worthy individuals with emotional and intellectual depth, yet now so many of us don't seem to see any problem with society encouraging many to reduce themselves to sexual objects. How is this rationalised?

edit: typo

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 80 points 9 months ago (3 children)

You can be sexual and engage in pornography without objectifying yourself or others.

The better question is why we continue to allow our society to demonize sexuality. Own your sexuality. Fuck the church.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 14 points 9 months ago

This. It's sinfully taboo and consequently deliciously titillating and commodified for exploitation. Cut it back to just a normal human action and a lot of that goes away

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 8 points 9 months ago

Own your sexuality. Fuck the church.

Speaking of which:

For instance, in 2000, a jury in Provo, Utah, took only a few minutes to clear Larry Peterman, owner of a Movie Buffs video store, in Utah County, Utah. He had been charged with distributing obscene material for renting pornographic videos that were displayed in a screened-off area of the store clearly marked as adults-only. The Utah County region had often boasted of being one of the most socially conservative areas in the United States. However, researchers had shown that guests at the local Marriott Hotel were disproportionately large consumers of pay-per-view pornographic material, accessing far more material than the store was distributing.

source

[–] Slowy@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In what way do you see embracing sexuality as contradictory to being a whole human? Can you give examples?

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago

Normalized???

It's still literally rated as less family friendly than watching blood and gore murder.

If anything I'd argue that sexual repression is still going as strong as ever in some places. In some cases to unhealthy amounts.

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you think porn and sexuality being normalized is a bad thing, you should reaaaaaaally think hard on your beliefs for a minute.

Sure, there’s the objectification of both men and women that pornography produces - that is a bad thing, but that’s not solely form porn either. Marketing ads love to objectify people (especially women) for an extra buck or two, and those are practically shoved in our faces openly every single day. Social media is basically just a gallery of this shit too if you’re just looking at whatever garbage the platform feeds you based on trends and what not.

Porn itself isn’t bad, and sexuality is arguably as important as both intellectual and emotional depth are because we’re humans and we have that primal part of our brains still. Yet in the US, for example, both of those things are worse than, say, a violent film. To me, that is the messed up part here.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How is being sexual reducing oneself? Its a glorious, natural thing.

[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's marketing. Emotion, sex, and religion are the best ways to sell and manipulate people.

It's all so soulless. I don't think it's sexuality or porn that's inherently bad, it's the people who fake their genuine self for money that are bad. Although, like with anything, limits for the voyeurs are healthy too.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago

Prostitution is often referred to as the "oldest profession."

It's as simple as that, sex sells.

Also, people are more sex obsessed in more sexually restrictive societies. One could argue the "sexual awakening" of the US is because of prior restrictive attitudes towards sex which are still prevalent and treat sex as more dangerous than violence.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

To the extent that sex workers are objectified, it is a direct result of misogyny, which teaches that it is acceptable to treat women as objects, and capitalism, which teaches that it is acceptable to treat workers as objects. At the confluence of these two industries we find pornography.

That said, I believe it is possible to do sex work in a way that is liberating and not objectifying, and in my opinion the hyper-fixation on the objectification of women in pornography is itself a result of misogyny in our culture. Every industry objectifies and mistreats workers, so why do we discuss this issue so frequently that the term objectification is practically exclusive to pornography and related contexts? In my view it is because patriarchy requires women to be “pure” and “unsullied” by sex so as to maximize their value to men. The issue gets subconsciously mixed into genuine concerns for the well-being of sex workers. Together these impulses often lead to paternalistic and unhelpful “solutions” like arresting sex workers, or FOSTA and SESTA which claim to be for the protection of sex workers but according to the vast majority I’ve heard speak on this issue are extremely harmful to their livelihood and wellbeing.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Were you aware of the recent study talking about male microchimerism in the female brain?

Here it is.

Your talk about woman needing to remain 'pure' because of 'the patriarchy' made me think of it.

I don't see that they've identified any downstream impact from having extra DNA, but wouldn't it be funny if that actually did impact folks negatively?

Personally, I'm sure glad I'm not carrying around a historical record of the folks I've been 'very friendly' with...

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 9 months ago

I did read an article on this topic recently and it is very fascinating but I’m not sure I understand that connection to what I was discussing.

Also, I think I also remembered reading that anyone can have microchimerism acquired through their mothers, so don’t be so sure that you are unaffected.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago

That occurs as a result of carrying a male fetus, not from male sexual partners.

[–] kjPhfeYsEkWyhoxaxjGgRfnj@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Same reason anything else is. It’s big money. Porn is a multi billion dollar industry.

As for why “extreme” porn is so “normalized” I think it’s more because it’s stigmatized ironically. Have you ever had an in person conversation about why there’s so much step family porn? No of course not because then both people would be acknowledging they watch porn for one. So the social factors that would guide things are totally absent.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

Well in my conversations this comes up. I am open to talk about that to friends (at least some of them) like other normal topics.

[–] AnaGram@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sexual peccadillos [+ religion] have dethroned kings. Can't threaten a person w/ revealing their bedroom secrets if no one gives af.

[–] Slowy@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Another question - you said things are going backwards. When do you feel that things were better, and what made that time practically better in terms of not objectifying people?

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz -3 points 9 months ago

I am quite young, so most of my knowledge of the social conditions of the past comes from literature, which is of course a pretty bad source. But it really seems like it is much more normalised nowadays for men to view women as sexual objects.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What could be more normal than the thing at the literal center of your being, as a human? Both literally and figuratively. It's literally the center of your body. And sex is literally the thing that makes us exist. Practically every animal does it. And we should be ashamed of it!?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sex is important for most people but if it's the "literal center of your being", you have problems. It's not like eating or breathing. And there's nothing uniquely human about it.

[–] Helix@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

I guess they meant that biologically, sex is needed for procreation. Without sex, you wouldn't be alive.

[–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If you're never having it and you want to be, that sucks. I found myself in that position years ago. I was pushing 300 pounds, unhappy, etc... It was a series of events and actions that helped me work through the issues, but the big two for me were psychedelics and a keto diet. (ADHD meds also made a big impact and I've seen signs that a gentle anti-depressant could maybe be a really helpful cherry on top for me, but it's still pretty new.)

I have no idea if that's relevant to you--your situation may be totally different. But if yours happens to be similar, I would just say to you that it's 1.) really, truly possible, 2.) it's really hard, and you might backslide some before it clicks, and 3.) it's totally worth the painful effort.

[–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

am uninterested

[–] donuts@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We were doing so well in realising that all human beings are worthy individuals with emotional and intellectual depth, yet now so many of us don’t seem to see any problem with society encouraging many to reduce themselves to sexual objects.

Human beings, like most other animals and plants, are fundamentally sexual beings.

It's good to value emotions and intellect, of course, but even before all of that comes the primitive basis of sexuality, sensual and sensory pleasure, and the propagation of species. Sex (with others or by yourself) is just as much a natural and core part of the human experience as eating, drinking, sleeping, and so on, and embracing sexual freedom and sex-positivity is in no way incompatible with emotional balance, intellectualism, or any other meaningful pursuit.

As such, masturbation or pornography aren't inherently bad or problematic in any way.

There are absolutely potential problems surrounding pornography, like human trafficking, but those issues are separate things that can and should be treated and handled as distinct. We have the tools as a society to deal with human trafficking and sexual violence, and we can do it without throwing sexual freedom and bodily autonomy under the bus.

In my view the last thing we should do as a society is to continue to engage in mindless sex-negativity, which has a long documented history of direct ties to the persecution of women and LGBTQ+ sexual minorities, as well as needlessly shaming people (sometimes to the point of inflicting real psychological damage) for exploring the full space of sexual possibilities by themselves or with consenting partners. Like everything else, ethics, responsibility, moderation and legality are things to consider, but you can do all of that while still being sex-positive and open minded about personal sexual liberty.

Changing the way you think about and practice sexuality (your own, others, and in general) allows you to know yourself and others in a more intimate, authentic and human way.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Are asexual people not human?

[–] donuts@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I wasn't trying to imply that. I've edited my post to reflect that I'm speaking generally. Sorry.

Personally I think that asexual people also benefit from sex-positivity and an honest discussion about the wide variety of forms of sexual expression. When we stop treating sex as some dirty taboo thing, and when we start accepting that everybody wants something different out of it (or maybe doesn't want it at all), I think it becomes easier to understand that all different kinds of people exist with different relationships to sex. That's not only OK, but a good thing.

A lot of social ills have come from the idea that people who express different forms of sexuality are wrong, gross, bad, sinful, mentally ill, etc. The sooner we move past that flawed and harmful concept, the better, in my opinion.

[–] Helix@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

No, we're superhuman.

[–] MiserableConstruct@beehaw.org -1 points 9 months ago

It seems like you are assigning your own beliefs and values on things and then claiming that people who don't share them are at a deficit. AKA a dumbass.