this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15384 readers
217 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rambos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Combination of line width, layer height and speed is what limits your hottend, not the nozzle size

Wanted to reply to another comment, but its saying that language is not alliwed lol

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] jtablerd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ever try 1.0........
On weed?

[–] ottk3@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Wow! That's awesome! What additional modifications were needed?

[–] papalonian@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Larger nozzles do kick ass. I personally use my 0.6 nozzles pretty heavily. As others have mentioned though, there are definitely scenarios where you'll really want or even need to drop to a smaller size. My printer hates trying to print PETG at higher sizes for example, maybe my hot end isn't powerful enough.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it also consumes way more filament- especially on single-wall parts or parts that have x perimeters rather than a perimeter thickness. They're great for structural prints, and large prints that you want done quickly. For comparison, a .4mm nozzle will have a nozzle area of about 0.125 mm^2, where a 0.6mm is .28 mm^2. and .8mm is .502mm^2. More than double the extrusion width.

like basically everything else in 3d printing, it's all about compromise and which compromises are acceptable.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, I don't agree with consumes 'way more' filament.

If your design calls for 1mm width wall. You're doing two passes with a 0.4 nozzle (0.5 width x2) or one pass with a 0.8 nozzle (1 width x1)

It's the same plastic.

You'll use more plastic on the infill, but you could arguably use a lower % infill if the infill wall thickness is larger.

So you could be using more plastic overall, but I don't think it would qualify as 'way more'.. maybe like 10% to 20% more.

[–] CobraA1@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I printed some tiny but detailed board game pieces recently, I don't think I'd get the detail I wanted with a 0.8. I also have Revo installed so I'm okay with swapping nozzles frequently.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For years now, I've always want to see someone try a dual nozzle setup. Same material, same filament, but two nozzles sizes.

Small nozzle for outer perimeter at a low layer height.

Large nozzle for inner perimeter and infill at higher layer heights.

Maybe in the future, someone will find a way to control nozzle size dynamically.

load more comments
view more: next ›