this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
56 points (91.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8492 readers
365 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's not exactly an honest headline, Larian already made an ARM build of this game to run natively on Apple silicon.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

According to the post, they were running the x64 version via emulation on ARM. Not a native ARM version. That's a lot more impressive to me.

[–] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's fair enough, but the article is wrong in other places.

The game has been developed exclusively for x86 systems: exclusively those built on x86 chips—Intel or AMD chips.

That is not true. See here. It is ARM native for Apple silicon as interpreted by MacOS's own activity monitor. There is no Rosetta translation going on here.

The article continues:

But Apple has a weak spot: gaming. Almost all games today, be they intended for PC or console, are built for x86 systems. Apple had sought to sort of get around this with the Game Compatibility Toolkit, which is a tool to get games running on ARM, but it's not being used to actually bring a larger gaming library to Apple devices just yet. Qualcomm's comparable tool, however, is.

So I'd take whatever else they state with a bucket of salt, they're just wrong and they didn't bother to check.

[–] yoyolll@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

On the one hand, it’s impressive it “just works” at all considering it’s probably the biggest question for ARM PCs. On the other hand, this game in particular runs at a higher framerate and resolution on their main competition (M3) . Kind of a weird flex.

[–] Agent_Karyo@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Last week Snapdragon claimed that Windows games "just work" on its latest ARM chip, the Snapdragon X Elite. At the time we said we'd believe it when we see it. Well, now we're seeing it. A small glimpse of it, anyways

So are we seeing it or are we seeing a small glimpse of it?

[–] Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 3 points 5 months ago
[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Seeing a glimpse of it is still seeing it technically

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't get it. does the Snapdragon X Elite have some sort of hardware emulation built in then?

[–] hydroel@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure Microsoft will be developing software emulation layer for Windows ARM, so it can support backwards compatibility on as many kinds of ARM processors as possible. But since Snapdragon is only claiming that this works on the X Elite, it's either a matter of performance, or hardware restrictions?

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago

Microsoft has a translation layer like Rosetta. It's called Prism.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I dont' see how it can run at all without some sort of emulation. the architecture is completely different.

[–] Roldyclark@literature.cafe 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The mac chips do this with rosetta

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

yeah I get that. im curious why this chip says its runs windows x86 right off the bat. at least that is what it sounds like to me from the article but maybe im misunderstanding. so it sounds to me like it has some sort of hardware emulation to x86.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It does. Apple has Rosetta and Microsoft has Prism. They are effectively the same thing, being a translation layer for x86 to ARM.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

yeah but its in the os not the hardware, no?

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think you are misunderstanding the article.

Windows for ARM is designed specifically for ARM, and it has the translation layer. The translation layer effectively allows it to function as if it's running an x86 Windows install off the bat by offering the ability to run x86 applications on the ARM hardware. It's not actually running an x86 OS.

The chipset is very powerful but it doesn't require additional hardware to achieve this translation. The additional processing power built into these chips are NPUs (Neural Processing Units) which are designed to more effectively run ML/AI/LLM workloads. The translation system just works on the normal raw processing power of the machine, just the same as the M-series Macs.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

ahhhhhh. yeah when I saw windows for arm I was just thinking windows. I thought they were able to just slap standard windows on an arm.