this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
92 points (95.1% liked)

News

22855 readers
4220 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Execution is not punishment, because the convicted person's human experience ends.

Execution is not rehabiliatory, for the same obvious reason.

Execution is not preventative of the same person reoffending any more than imprisonment is.

Execution is not preventative of other people committing the same offense, because the act of execution is removed so completely in time and space from the crime and conviction. And it has to be so removed because of how completely wrong the justice system is kind of all the time.

Execution serves one purpose, and that is vengeance. The State should not be in the business of delivering vengeance to certain people.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Execution also doesn’t reduce offense rates because the severity of punishment doesn’t factor into decision making above “life ruining if convicted” it’s the certainty of being caught that reduces rates. The uk used to hang pickpockets in the town square and you’d get your pockets picked if you stood there watching.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention, if you're already going to go away for life just for rape, why not just kill the kid and dump the body in the woods too?

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

This is exactly what rapists who have been to prison often do because they don't want to go back.

[–] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 4 points 4 months ago

This just tells me, watching people die induces criminal behavior.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I wonder if this would actually deter would-be rapists or incentivize them to simply murder the child so they can’t talk. This seems incredibly reckless without data to support killing these criminals actually reduces child rapes.

Also, I think they might be surprised when these highly conservative legislative bodies execute their hometown pastors instead of drag queens.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's no evidence that capital punishment deters murder, so I'm not sure why it would deter rape.

I imagine there's still a fair amount of theft in Saudi Arabia despite their cutting the hands off of thieves.

Justice systems where punishments can be meted out that are purely punitive are not especially just.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That assumes the it’s intended to be punishment. I would argue the goal of the laws, stated or not, is vengeance.

ETA: I’m not disagreeing with your statement. Just offering a modified viewpoint.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm against death penalty even for the most heinous crimes for several reasons but the main one being that you'll never going to get a justice system that's 100% accurate in their convictions. Jailing an innocent person is already awful enough but just imagine the sense of injustice when sitting on a death row for a crime you didn't commit. This is an issue especially on cases that provoke strong emotional reactions on people. The default is to believe those accusations and defending yourself just makes one seem more guilty. The mere accusation of rape can already ruin a person's life let alone when the victim is a child.

[–] detective__bunk@real.lemmy.fan 3 points 4 months ago

I sure hope no one gets really accused.