this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
25 points (75.5% liked)

World News

32143 readers
822 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElCanut@jlai.lu 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Anti-tank missiles seem to be the biggest killers of tanks"

Peak investigative journalism right there 👌

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

I was laughing about that too. Anti-tank missiles taking out tanks? Pfft as if.

[–] CommieCretzl@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

in a war that has eaten more than 6,000 Russian tanks and at least 700 Ukrainian ones

Uhh, I have trouble taking those numbers seriously

[–] VHS@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Maybe if the first number includes tanks of Russian manufacture in Ukrainian service

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] nekandro@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Russia literally has so many tanks they're using RC T-62s to demine. Something tells me they don't exactly have a tank shortage.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

6000/700 K/D

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I am so tickled by the hubris necessary to use an actual jet engine in your tank. Maybe I'm wrong and everyone does it, but to me it seems like the kind of thing you do if you can't imagine ever having to hide the tank, you build a giant bridge-cracker with a jet engine inside. It seems like signature reduction in a peer conflict was not something the designers ever thought about when sketching up their Big Gun Imperialism Mobile.

[–] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago

Both the Americans and the Soviets went to a jet turbine on their MBT at around the same time, but the Russians decided it wasn't worth it with the next generation and went back to diesel.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago

Like this: "kaBOOM!"