News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Thank god for the TSA, keeping us all safe from 4oz of shampoo and water bottles, though, right?
You jest, but we all know the damage you could do with a 5oz bottle of shampoo is incalculable.
I’m so f’n tired of this shit. Bonus tired for bringing up the tsa low hanging fruit in an area they don’t even check. I’m not a tsa fanboy, but does nobody here remember security before 9/11? You understand that the reason for liquid limitation is that the combined amount allowed was determined to be less likely to be able to take down an airplane if used to make a multi-part explosive?
The contractors hired by the airlines? All the people they couldn’t re-hire on to the tsa because of criminal histories they’d lied about when applying to the tsa after having worked contract security for the airlines? Lucky if they spoke English? All the ones with fake green cards and the like?
Y’all think that was stellar security? Want privatization so we can go back to security where the bottom line is always the focus, your demise is an acceptable risk at some point when calculated on a quarterly report spreadsheet?
Downvote me to shit, but there is no perfect system. This system is a damn sight better than what came before, and while some might call the tsa “security theater”, the predecessor was barely better than amusement park bag checks.
Security theater is worse than no security at all because neither provides you protection while security theater has additional hassle.
That's cool and all, but they fail to detect weapons all the time. Just because airport security has never been good doesn't mean we can't be critical of them now. They constantly implement new procedures that just plain don't work beyond making air travel an even bigger hassle. I don't think Lemmy users are big on privatization ever, and no one suggested that, but this kind of failure is a pretty big deal. Our demise is still an acceptable risk, except now it's because they hire people who don't give one single rat's ass, pay them poorly, and use all kinds of things that look great on the surface but aren't effective at preventing a guy from bringing a butcher knife into the airport (at what's usually a pretty slow time of night) and very nearly succeeding at murdering someone.
Like I said, there is no perfect system. People are people and they fuck up. All the time. For some reason we have this really messed up idea in our heads that when we place people in certain positions we expect perfection. Doctors. Pilots. TSA. Whoever. Zero mistakes. But that’s not what happens, is it? There’s plenty of bad doctors. There’s an unfortunate number of doctors that fuck up. Same with pilots. Same with the TSA. Have a doctor do thousands of operations in a day. See how many mistakes they make. How many patients suffer for it? How many planes crash, or just screw up in ways that don’t result in death but break through some serious safety barriers?
It’s really messed up that we put people in positions and expect perfection, an impossibility, and then criticize them harshly for failure. The only way IMO to deal with this is to strive for improvement while understanding that people are just humans.
I get mocking the TSA. I deal with them every day I go to work. Yeah, it’s frustrating. The rules seem arbitrary and ineffective. But the only way I can balance this is that we need to compare it to what we had before and look at what we’re willing to implement (and pay for) to improve the system. I never hear of anyone with any decent suggestions, so I get tired of people bitching when they have nothing useful to offer.
E: ironic lol that I said “zero mistakes” while immediately promptly misspelling “mistakes”.
the TSA is not "not perfect"; they're a joke.
it's pure theater. they have basically no ability to detect actual weapons at all, hence why it's a common problem when passengers arrive abroad only to find out they accidentally carried loose ammunition across borders.
there's a huge difference between "not quite perfect" and "completely and utterly useless waste of time, money, and resources", the latter of which describes the TSA.
IF they actually did anything useful at all, then fine, you have a point. but they don't, which is why people are disagreeing with you.
because in principle you're right, that security is required and should be taken seriously....but the TSA isn't actually providing security. they're providing the appearance of security.