343
Biden administration sets 50 miles per gallon fuel economy standard for 2031
(www.washingtonpost.com)
this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
343 points (97.5% liked)
News
23267 readers
3245 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
People just don't like them 🤷♂️
Most of the folks who want an EV and who can live with an EV already have one. It's not the politicians preventing people from buying.
None of that is true.
No, they're just enabling the people who are making it less viable in exchange for bribes.
Until range and recharge time can complete with ICE vehicles, EVs will continue to be viable basically in the cities only. The USA is massive.
Define competitive https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-06-07/long-range-evs-now-cost-less-than-the-average-us-new-car
300 mile range is now long range? Lol the fuck are you smoking.
You didn't read the article or even the sub title. 300 miles is the minimum thresold in terms of specification of cars that they are using for comparison in terms of economics. Almost all of the compared vehicles are in the mid 300 mile range. Average ICE is about 400 mile range.
There are also more expensive consumer EVs that are in the high 400/500 mile range but that's not the focus of the article.
ICE vehicles do not have a hard limit on their range. They can refuel in a few minutes. Even with supercharger stations available your not getting that range. Companies also advertise mileage per charge in the best conditions and driving style. Most EVs do not make the ranges claimed.
And yes I did read it, 350 miles was the average range, this still is nothing if it cannot be recharged in a few minutes.
EVs have their place, but they're still a ways off from replacing ICE vehicles.
Takes 10-20m to charge to 80% on most EVs today at a L3 station. Just trying to make sure you're informed.
Do you think advertising standards are different for EVs compared to ICE vehicles?
How many lvl3 stations are out there outside the cities? Hell how many L3 stations are in the city? And 80% charge now isn't getting you full range. I know exactly how EVs work and operate, they're still not ready to replace ICE vehicles in anything other than city drivers. They're getting better and better but it's just not there yet.
Okay, EV sales are hitting a plateau just as they become competitive and viable with ICE, because people love them. Whatever you say.
I'm gonna need a source on that. That sounds extremely unlikely.
The technology has been competitive for a decade or more. There's just more availability and better prices to fill an extremely underserved demand.
When most people didn't know that Teslas have the build quality of a 1980s Yugo, their only big problems were that they were too expensive and that they couldn't keep up with demand.
Those are still the main issues with EVs but as more automakers have joined the field, both problems are rapidly diminishing at the same time as people become increasingly aware of the fact that our survival as a species depends more than anything else on divesting from fossil fuels as quickly as possible.
I'm a car guy, and I'd like to have one. I'm waiting for someone to make one fast and affordable like a tesla only not a tesla because elon is a d-bag. If he gets kicked out of the company, I'll buy one the next day.
What fast and affordable levels are you looking for? I assume we're talking Tesla dual motor fast and a budget of 55k? What's wrong with the ionic?
You can get used dual motor 3's for around 15k where I'm at. The tesla is a second quicker in 0 to 60 and the quarter mile, which is a lot faster.