this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
774 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5467 readers
2301 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

My calculations show that around the age of 80 he will be massive enough to turn earth into a black hole if evenly distributed onto its volume

Edit: actually by the age of 30, because I misread the current age to be 12 months

[–] Tire@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And how will this affect the stock price?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 9 points 5 months ago

Positively, probably, as the stock will get to the moon literally and long before that moment

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Oh shit, the economy!

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If that's with it evenly distributed, then with all that weight as a virtual point source due to the difference in size between the baby and Earth, wouldn't the baby collapse to its roche limit even faster? And as long as it's not a kuggleblitz (that's def not spelled right) black hole it would quickly consume the Earth and grow even larger, right?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

Yes, but then we would better use human body density to determine the size of an object, it's not going to be realistically (lol) a point source anyway and will take longer to become a black hole, I think 🤔