this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
2638 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

58092 readers
3731 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 216 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Doesn't this break competition laws?
Couldn't Google/YouTube be sued over this?

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 155 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Microsoft got repeatedly hit over this kind of shenanigans in MSIE during and after the anti-trust lawsuit.

Sadly, that was 20 years ago. I'm not having much faith in American justice system doing anything about this nowadays.

[–] Sendbeer@lemm.ee 51 points 10 months ago (3 children)

They really weren't that effective with Microsoft then either. The antitrust was far too late for Netscape and allowed Microsoft to hold a dominate market share with IE until they allowed the browser to deprecate and Google came in with a much better browser and took over the browser market (and are now doing the same bullshit).

As long as we keep giving these companies meaningless fines or wait until the damage is irreversible companies are going to always push the limit and look at any repercussions as just a cost of doing business.

So yeah, not much faith in anything changing.

[–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That is why I am in favour of the financial death penalty. Fines should be 10x the damage done. If a company cannot pay it, they are required to become a non profit.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Fines should be 10x the damage done

What are your monetary damages for this?

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think a better solution is one year of global revenue (not profit) as it’s really hard to determine damages in cases like this. That way, it’s legitimately a death sentence regardless of the size or scale of the company. If you set the fines at an amount not linked to profit or revenue, all you’re doing is making it extremely hard for the little guy but less hard for the big corporations - the ones you really want to go after.

[–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago

I like it, much more practical.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah stuff like this really needs to be percentual and fined to the CEOs and the board, not the company as an entity.

Oh, Microsoft valued at 200 bil for shareholders? Well sorry C's and boardies, you gotta scrunge up 2 bil each now, personally. Those are fines they'd at least notice.

(edit)
Come to think of it, the fined-personally-to-the-decisionmaker might really be the big thing here on its own. The company did this shit under you, CEO. It was your corporate policy and hiring practices that allowed this to happen, even if you did not press the button. You pay up. You take the blame, not the people under you just following orders.

[–] uid0gid0@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This just ignores the reason that corporations exist in the first place, to shield people from personal liability. There is a mechanism by which you can go after that called "piercing the corporate veil" but it is an extremely high bar to hit.

[–] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

the reason that corporations exist in the first place, to shield people from personal liability

Which is the problem. As parent rightly pointed out, lack of personal liability is exactly why corporations pull this kind of bullshit. The solution is to lower the bar for holding individuals, particularly executives, personally responsible for the actions of the organizations they control.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You should look into all of the anti-monopoly actions that Lina Khan has been pursuing as head of the FTC. Under her tenure the watchdogs have had more teeth than ever before. It takes time for this stuff to make a difference, but they are most decidedly doing the work (Cory Doctorow has some excellent write ups on this if you check his blog).

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

He lionizes her a bit much, but yes she has done far more than her predecessor.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

EU anthem intensifies

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Microsoft got repeatedly hit over this kind of shenanigans in MSIE during and after the anti-trust lawsuit.

And all they had to do was drag the trial out until a favorable administration took office.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago

Well they also dragged out the trial so long that time and costs rendered the plaintiff (Netscape) hopeless.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

malicious slowdowns like this are why microsoft abandoned (non chrome) edge, too. Cause they couldnt keep up with fixing the constant fuckery google was doing, and users are idiots and blamed edge for all the problems.

[–] Sendbeer@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Microsoft was kind of getting their comeuppance there. They did the exact same billshit when they dominated the market with IE.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're right.

Lets let google get away with murder because Microsoft did bad a decade+ ago.

[–] Sendbeer@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

I don't think that's what I said? At least it's not how I meant it.

[–] creditCrazy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You can always count on lobbiests to enshitifiy the laws

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Not in the U.S. Not as long as conservatives (incl. neo-liberals) have the power to protect them.

Our conservative politicians are bought and paid for by large anti-competitive corporations.

[–] remus989@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Bought and paid for with a pittance.

[–] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They are bribed for so little that it would be almost easier to make a dystopian sounding PAC with money raised by small dollar donations to bribe them to do what the people want instead of them doing what rich donors want.

[–] remus989@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Only if that PAC could somehow guarantee a cushy job post politics.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Well, can't hurt to try.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Yeah, the fines just aren't big enough for Google to care.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

Wait for it to become equally shitty in all browsers, and then you can only watch in a special Youtube Windows app.