this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
31 points (80.4% liked)

Canada

9561 readers
915 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Yes, but there has to be viable alternatives to actually let people change.

People won't stop using the highway for their commute if there isn't another option like a train, reliable rapid transit bus, or an affordable apartment closer to the office.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Yes, but there has to be viable alternatives to actually let people change.

But what comes first? An incentive to change or an alternative to the status quo that's been here for over 100 years?

Incentives are needed. Otherwise, as long as it's free to pollute, people won't do anything.

[–] nueonetwo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

The alternative to the status quo is the incentive to change. If you build the transit and make it a viable alternative in terms of costs and time, people will take it: millennials, gen z, and soon gen alpha aren't driving at the rate of previous generations for many reasons, they want public transit but they are forced to drive. If cities actually start to prioritize public and active transit infrastructure improvements over those for single occupancy vehicles in a meaningful way people will take them. This is one of those candy for dinner scenarios where the public wants what they want without understanding why it's not good for them and the gov't needs to step up and do what's right instead of caving to the pressure.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

How do you build transit infrastructure when you don't know where the demand is?

I encourage you to look into China's bullet train network, they did what you're suggesting. And the last I heard the system is struggling because the stations and lines weren't built where people actually needed them so it's heavily underutalized.

The most successful public transit systems were ones built up over time. It's going to take decades to fix public transit in many of our cities, are there any cities that aren't doing this?

Also remember that city policy falls under provincial jurisdiction. I was surprised this year to even see the feds start trying to throw money at that problem and incentivise cities to rethink zoning. But it takes time, and it also takes voting people who care into the right spots (city hall and provincial governments)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)