this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
204 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3485 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Having to pay for training data would rapidly sky rocket costs making it impossible for open source projects or even smaller for profit companies to survive. We are rapidly going to find ourselves in an AI driven economy and this would cement Google and Microsoft owning it.

Not to mention that not a dime would go to individuals. Companies like Reddit, Getty, Adobe and Penguin have all the data, we already gave it to them a long time ago.

They write strongly worded letters so we play right into their hands but the big AI companies are drooling at the thought of it. It would fuck us hard.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Gonna be real with you because I work directly with these companies in helping do this type of thing exactly: it's astromically high already, and nowhere near profitable. It's all startup grift.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"It's already bad so we might as well make it incredibly worse" is not a very compelling argument IMO.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting everyone just go along with it?

If anyone was looking for the plant, here you go^^^

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I'm suggesting that we should not do the thing that will make everything incredibly worse.

Who do you think I'm a "plant" for? I'm advising the course of action that would be less advantageous for big corporations, so what, I'm a plant for the little guy?

[–] porksoda@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Not to mention that not a dime would go to individuals. Companies like Reddit, Getty, Adobe and Penguin have all the data, we already gave it to them a long time ago.

This is one of the big reasons I never did 23andMe. Don't get me wrong, I'm super curious about what it has to tell me, but giving (paying to give it actually) my DNA to a private company that's amassing a huge repository of human DNA is a terrible idea.