this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
575 points (99.0% liked)

Work Reform

9797 readers
158 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mark your calendars

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Unfortunately the Taft-Hartley act made political and solidarity strikes unlawful. Solidarity strike ≈ General strike. There are some very minor differences, but I don't see that mattering.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taft%E2%80%93Hartley_Act

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's the point. If all the contracts expire at the same time, it's a coincidence, not a general strike in the eyes of the law

[–] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What are they going to do, throw the entire working population in jail?

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

If I had to guess, I'd say the actual answer isn't jail but "start shooting" while also pumping propoganda about those lazy union guys who just don't want to work.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All the effective strikes are illegal.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 13 points 10 months ago

Fucking exactly. We're only allowed to have small relief valves to prevent riots, we aren't allowed to actually fight for a better future.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taft%E2%80%93Hartley_Act

Interesting that it was a Republican sponsored bill, and voted in by a Republican Senate and House.

Also interesting that the President Truman had vetoed it.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

A political, solidarity, secondary strike etc. is where a union or group under an in-force bargaining agreement are not allowed to strike just because their friends/fellow workers are striking. While not under a collective agreement then they can strike. If everyone's agreement expires simultaneously, then it is possible for any or every group to strike.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

An interesting read, thank you for sharing.

The anti-communism slant in the law was slightly humorous to read, as it shows you the times in which the law was written.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Okay. The police will just have to arrest hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people all across the country then.