sxt

joined 1 year ago
[–] sxt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Did this release see sched_ext merged? Was looking forward to messing around with that.

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I rise above the world

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Similar incident

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Certainly more engaging and cohesive than SB and yeah, we have to walk things back from EW. Overall I liked the story but the first half was a bit anemic. I think it would've benefited from playing up the competition/stakes of the succession some more - a bit more intrigue there.

Definitely think it'll land towards SB where the story is hit or miss for people but the post patch stuff is really good.

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If you've got an extra still I'd be down

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Directly onto pizza. The end

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nice! Always cool to get more rally options

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Their logos are always great. Took a class on Vulcan in college and managed to snag one of these .

Should probably wear it more often but it was probably too big for me even at the time

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why is this news

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 55 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Another one I found: Which is just this I think https://medium.com/@azalben/re-can-i-drink-this-delicious-sounding-bleach-8b9db1326f9c

Granted I'm baiting it and it does say not to drink it.

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I doubt the goal is to produce easily understood bash, otherwise you'd just write bash to begin with. It's probably more similar to a typescript transpiler that takes in a language with different goals and outputs something the interpreter can execute quickly (no comment on how optimized this thing is).

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I believe version 555 of the Nvidia driver is supposed to get the explicit sync patch.

 

I am attempting to follow this https://www.procustodibus.com/blog/2022/09/wireguard-port-forward-from-internet to forward traffic from a few ports on a public oracle vps to other ports on my local server through a wireguard connection. Currently I am doing this using rinetd, but I was looking for a more normal way of forwarding traffic. (Also looking to forward UDP traffic at some point.)

After stopping rinetd, adding these rules to the public server's wg config

# packet forwarding
PreUp = sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1

# port forwarding
PreUp = iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i ens3 -p tcp --dport 443 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.144.65.2:8443
PostDown = iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -i ens3 -p tcp --dport 443 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.144.65.2:8443

# packet masquerading
PreUp = iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE

and restarting the wg connection, I'm seeing traffic on the ens3 port but none entering wg0 via tcpdump. I feel like I probably have conflicting iptables rules saved https://pastebin.com/0eNwhNKM but I don't really know enough about whats going on there to fix it. I feel like its probably the wireguard-*-rule ones (created by pivpn possibly?) but I'm not sure.

Edit way later: Ended up just using rinetd for the udp connections. Ubuntu doesn't include the latest version here https://github.com/samhocevar/rinetd which is able to do UDP connections. The docker container RxBrad suggested uses that version within the docker container to make the redirections so it will be roughly equivalent.

view more: next ›