ooli

joined 1 year ago
 

Lucas’ original vision included McGregor’s character ultimately taking on his Jedi Master’s name as part of his attempt to honor his mission to train Anakin. “At the end, as Obi-Wan dies and Qui-Gon defeats Darth Maul and stays with his Master as he passes away, he not only takes on his Master’s quest, but he takes on his name. Qui-Gon becomes Obi-Wan,” McCaig revealed. “That’s why when you see Alec Guinness in A New Hope, he puts his hood down and goes, ‘Obi-Wan? Now that’s a name I’ve not heard.’ Because he’s not Obi-Wan, he’s Qui-Gon

 

As a retrospective within a retrospective, Film Forum’s ongoing tribute to the great Japanese actor Tatsuya Nakadai features five films directed by Japan’s grand master of filmmaking, Akira Kurosawa. It’s difficult to overestimate this great movie artist’s influence on mainstream filmmaking. One could, for instance, compile a weeklong screening series of films that were cribbed from Kurosawa’s 1954 classic “The Seven Samurai,” ranging from John Sturges’s “The Magnificent Seven” (1960) to Pixar’s “A Bug’s Life” (1998). “Yojimbo,” a period samurai drama itself inspired in part by the work of the American detective novelist Dashiell Hammett, became the basis for Sergio Leone’s “A Fistful of Dollars” and the radically different approach to the Western genre that followed in both Italy and America.

Accompanying Mr. Nakadai on his current visit to New York is the star’s longtime friend, Teruyo Nogami, who served as Kurosawa’s script supervisor and assistant. Ms. Nogami will appear tomorrow evening at Japan Society for a program called “50 Years with Akira Kurosawa: An Evening with Teruyo Nogami,” in which the guest of honor will discuss her years with Kurosawa and her new book, “Waiting on the Weather,” an illustrated account of her decades of work with the director, from 1950’s “Rashomon” until his death 10 years ago.

Kurosawa’s pioneering use of multiple camera coverage and slow motion, his breathtaking gift for composition and atmosphere, his mastery of both long-take camera blocking and acute editorial montage were without peer. For most of the director’s storied career, Ms. Nogami was at his elbow bearing witness to nearly every creative decision he made. Though she demurs in this regard, after reading her book and speaking with her in person recently, if one were to say that Kurosawa is one of the 20th century’s filmmaking deities, Ms. Nogami was his archangel.

On most film sets, a script supervisor works with the director and the rest of the crew to ensure that all the business spelled out in the shooting script is captured on film in a way that will maintain continuity when the discontinuous pieces of a sequence, invariably shot out of order for practicality, are assembled in the editing room.

“It’s a very important part to play,” Ms. Nogami said via translator. “But for Mr. Kurosawa, this was not so important. Mr. Kurosawa would say that when he was shooting a film, he was just gathering material in order to edit.”

Each day on-set or on location during the making of a Kurosawa film was followed by a marathon editing session using the previous day’s footage. “He was always editing during the course of shooting,” Ms. Nogami explained. The director carried the film in his head for the entirety of production. “The next day, when he was shooting something, he had the previous day’s editing in mind.”

Kurosawa’s particular and highly influential brand of two-fisted humanism yielded action sequences of spectacular imagination and impact. If one is looking for summer blockbuster thrills with the gravity of real drama and the resonance of bravura storytelling, one need look no further than 1961’s “Yojimbo”; its ostensible sequel, 1962’s “Sanjuro”; 1963’s “High and Low”; 1980’s “Kagemusha,” and 1985’s “Ran” in their big-screen engagements at Film Forum.

A body of work as strong as this almost requires such an evening of discussion with its makers, but there was one question that this reporter couldn’t resist asking Ms. Nogami in advance of her appearance at Japan Society.

As “Sanjuro” comes to a close, the titular errant samurai, played by Toshiro Mifune, makes his getaway having freed a group of young swordsmen from a frame-up by their superiors. But as the young men look on, Mr. Nakadai’s character confronts Mifune and demands satisfaction. Face to face, barely a pace apart, the two samurai stare each other down for what seems an eternity but is in fact less than 30 seconds. Then, in a single, lightning-quick move, they draw their swords out and up. Mr. Nakadai’s chest erupts in a geyser of blood that, though it single-handedly reset the standard for on-screen graphic violence, is upstaged by the look of absolute astonishment on the actor’s face. Once seen it is simply unforgettable.

I asked Ms. Nogami to confirm the long-standing rumor that Kurosawa cultivated Mr. Nakadai’s remarkably realistic reaction by attaching the necessary special-effects hardware to both actors and not telling either of them which one was going to die on-screen. Was she also in the dark as to which character was marked for death?

“No, no, no,” she said. “Of course I knew and they knew.” With that, Ms. Nogami produced a pen and, holding it loosely overhand in the Japanese way, began to sketch on a sheet of paper. “It would have been impossible to put the thing in two people,” she said as she drew the two combatants, one of whom is tethered to the earth by a thick black line traveling down one leg. “It started from here, and traveled through this pipe,” she said of the tubing that would provide the blood fountain set to erupt on cue. The rest of the hose was buried in the ground and traveled back far enough that the pressurized plunger that would set it off was out of sight of Kurosawa’s cameras.

“It took one month of practice,” Ms. Nogami said — practice for which Mr. Nakadai was conspicuously absent. “It was important that he not know how it was going to happen.” When the time came to take the shot, Mr. Nakadai needed to be unfamiliar with what the effect would feel like. “They rehearsed with a stand-in,” she said.

On the day of the actual shoot, Mr. Nakadai only “knew that he was going to be killed and that there would be blood somehow,” Ms. Nogami said. “When they put the pipe on him, he said, ‘How is this going to happen?’ And the technician in charge said, ‘Don’t worry, don’t worry, you’ll just feel a little push.'”

With everything in place, the cameras rolled and Ms. Nogami counted down the 25 seconds until the fateful sword draw took place. When the blood erupted, it was so explosive that Ms. Nogami recalled the actor later telling her that “the pressure of the liquid pushed him toward the sky and he had to fight to control it.”

For Kurosawa, the resulting mixture of mock viscera and very real astonishment meant that the first take was the keeper. “When the blood came out, Nakadai was so surprised,” Ms. Nogami said. He wasn’t the only one. As the cameras rolled, Ms. Nogami recalled, the connecting hose sprang a leak in view of the other two cameras. Nevertheless, the director knew a performance when he saw one. “‘Even with this incident,'” Ms. Nogami said he told her, “‘I’ll take it. We cannot do it another time. Nakadai will know how it happens and he will never get the same expression.'”

Despite a month’s work yielding only a single take, Kurosawa, according to Ms. Nogami, “refused to take another shot.” The solution as to how best to deal with an enormous change at the last minute lay not on the set that day but in the cutting room the following night. “No,” he told his assistant, “I’ll think about it when I edit.”

 
[–] ooli@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

For the few people who didn't already watch it, and the best movie of all time :

Mad Max: Fury road (2015 ) by Miller .

This is what film story telling is about: having an entire weird universe told through visual medium. The 1st half hour has mad max gagged and incapable of talking, and it is amazing. Preferably on big screen.

A gem from the past:

Taboo(1999), by Nagisa Ôshima,

a samurai movie with hint of homosexuality. and an ending that can only be understood by paying close attention to the sound off screen.

A classic:

Seven samurai(1954), Kurosawa.

Just enjoy the black and white shot , and immerse in old Japanese culture

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is an okay movie, with some flaws. Rain surge to ultra competence out of nowhere being indeed the most outrageous.

Here is my few thousand words theory about the movie:

spoilerIn the film "Alien: Romulus," the title purports (as in "Prometheus") to reference the name of the ship. Yet, akin to "Prometheus", it is a ruse. The film alludes to the tale of the two brothers from antiquity, Romulus and Remus. Let us recall this story, penned in 800 BC, which itself inspired the myth of Abel and Cain (with its earliest written traces dating back to 400 BC):

Romulus founds the city of Rome by plowing a furrow to mark the location of the new city's walls. According to Roman legend (which favors Romulus, the founder of the capital), Remus mocks his brother and challenges him by leaping over the furrow. What might begin as an innocent jest between two brothers turns tragic: Romulus slays his brother Remus for this act. Romulus justifies his deed by declaring that no one shall ever breach the ramparts of Rome.

It is evident that Romulus is not the hero the Romans would have us believe. He is the killer, the villain, the Cain of the Jewish narrative.

In the film, which is a precise reiteration of Ridley Scott's original "Alien," it is more expedient to identify the differences between the two films than to find their similarities. There exists but a single distinction between them: there are two siblings.

Rain and her brother Andy.

Kay and her brother Tyler.

In the first "Alien" of 1979, the crew shares no familial ties. However, as in "Romulus," they approach a vessel that has emitted a distress signal. They must explore this ship. The diverse crew (a mix of male and female, Spanish and English) does not get along. They must encounter the aliens. A facehugger attacks a crew member. A chestburster escapes from a human body. The heroine is clad in scant attire to emphasize her vulnerability in her struggle against the primary alien. An alien is ejected into space as the heroine screams, "Take that, you son of a bitch." For, as in "Alien," the heroine is a woman, and the sole survivor, while the men exhibit toxic masculinity and meet their demise.

Of course, the most significant commonality (and the key to the film's true message) is the android Andy. While Rain is presented as the main character, there is no doubt that the true hero of the film is Andy. Rain has no reason to be so effective against the aliens. How can she conceive of utilizing the ship's gravity when she is a "space virgin"? How does she wield a weapon when, unlike Tyler, she has never shown a passion for combat? How is she so resolute when the film's beginning portrays her as ineffectual (to the extent that others assure her she will not have to leave the ship)?

Certainly, Rain is the heroine, for Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) was in the original "Alien." Yet Ripley was a pilot, and the rest of the crew admired her worth at the film's outset. Thus, when she acts with such determination, it does not come as a surprise, as it does with Rain. Andy, on the other hand, though initially depicted as weak, becomes competent with a mere change of programming. This is why the android in the film appears more credible than the suddenly indestructible Rain, who lacks explanation for her transformation.

The issue with Andy lies in his name. In the four preceding films of the series, the androids are named in alphabetical order: In the first film, "Alien," the android is called Ash. In the second film, he is named Bishop. In the next, it is Call. In the previous film, "Prometheus," he is called David (which presents another problem). Therefore, Andy should have a name beginning with an E, as he appears here in the fifth film of the series. In the film, Rook, the other android, refers to Andy by his construction designation N.D. Does the android's name begin with an N? Is the film meant to be the 14th in the series? Unlikely. No! Andy begins with an "A" because he is the twin brother of Ash, the first android in the series.

Returning to the legend of Romulus and Remus, as in the legend, Andy kills a sister, Kay, by refusing to open the door for her to escape the alien. Similarly, Rain kills a brother, Tyler, when he rushes toward her and is struck from behind by the alien's prehensile tail intended for Rain.

Two deaths that are more symbolic than real. The evidence: having endured an assault worse than her brother Tyler, Kay manages to reach the ship. Tyler should have survived. So should Kay, if she had not used the product developed by Weyland Industries. The deaths of a brother and sister at the hands of another brother and sister merely echo the film's theme: to kill Remus.

For this is precisely what Alvarez attempts here. Like in the Roman legend, his film is the twin brother of the original "Alien" from 1979, replicating scene for scene the same narrative. Just as in the legend, "Alien: Romulus" claims to establish a new series, one superior to that which followed "Alien" in 1979. Like in the legend, "Alien: Romulus" seeks to slay its brother, "Alien: Remus" (1979). Alvarez hopes to rid himself of the entire legacy and strength of the original "Alien" by employing the symbolism of the Roman legend. As in the tale of Abel and Cain, "Alien: Romulus," out of jealousy, attempts to kill the film that started it all. Undoubtedly, like in the legend, we are not deceived and take sides with the original "Alien."

 
[–] ooli@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hum I doubt even the majority of mod are "anti marxist" or "pro zionist".. may be you're looking at the more active communities, with few mod over them.. But for what I read I never had that impression

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem with chronological forum, is that it was a used tactic to post massively new topics to "hide" some controversial topic on the "second page". Not to say that voting doesn't have its own problem.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I heard about Catalhoyuk yesterday.. So i have no clue how scientist are perceiving it. But the construction: all together under the same roof, with no street, is pretty striking.

Obviously this dude calling it "anarcho communist" is biased.. the wiki article seems to purposely avoid a neutral tone to make it clear.
But I can see why he came to that conclusion. I dont think we have any other settlement even remotely resembling this one, to make a more informed guess

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

i needed your comment to realize I forgot to put the wiki link. You can forward your complaint to Bookchin ;)

Noting the lack of hierarchy and economic inequality, historian and anti-capitalist author Murray Bookchin has argued that Çatalhöyük was an early example of anarcho-communism.[40]

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

how would you describe it? a no street settlement? a roof way village? a gigantic family house?

[–] ooli@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So you think if something is bad enough it is ok to discriminate again. Meaning you place the bar of disparaging some contend at around average value , so not at high elite value.

That can hold. It still depend on your value judgement of the content in question. Someone could think that lemmy.ml contend is "unfunny garbage".

The point of a site like this one, is that not one person is the decider. Not you or me. Users vote what is or is not funny, so that the "avergagely" funny systematically go on top. The more people they are, the more the average will mirror the real world population... I think considering the average population to not be "worthy" is pretty elitist. There are a lot of problem in such a site: Hive mind, trolling, mass vote, bot usage.... But discriminating against normal human user (even the worse one) doesn't seems to me like a solution

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

this is a very elitist approach camarad

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

so that's where the sushi glory hole (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbGchfT3yMs) song come from

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Microwave, I never had one, because, I never wanted to eat ultra-processed microwaved food.

But now , I use it all the time:

  1. to reheat my tea
  2. cook my vegetable (since I learn they retain more element being microwaved than cook)
  3. I can stock on pure frozen product, tuna , salmon, raspberry... and eat them when I want without being afraid of spoilage.

So now all my meal are more healthy just because of microwave, which seems counterintuitive, but is true.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

where the link to the download?

view more: next ›