lhx

joined 1 year ago
[–] lhx@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I was like Star Wars ripped off Dune! Oh wait…

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Proof of this? YouTubers have opened up both sets. They aren’t the same.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Owned by same company does not mean same tool. I own a bunch of m12 fuel and some Ryobi too. My Milwaukee stuff kicks the pants off of Ryobi but it is also a lot more expensive.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

About half of USA believes that. See the Republican party.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 67 points 9 months ago (5 children)

If you cut taxes on the rich it will benefit everyone.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s apparently good at 100% at classifying autism in groups that have already been flagged for high chance of ASD. It is not good at just any old picture.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

That’s not a common thing in American contracts. Severability clauses take care of that.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago (11 children)

That’s gonna be a lawsuit…

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Yes. Most of my family / peers have iPhones. So iMessage is the standard for them. We use signal for the rest.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

You’re referring to the contract concept of “consideration” which sometimes is the same as compensation but can also do doing/ not doing an action. Sometimes consideration isn’t required either, particularly if the original contract had adequate consideration and says future amendments don’t have to have it. (Depends a lot on which state). That may or may not matter here. It really depends on the specific terms at dispute and you can’t just assume it fixes this issue.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Like all good lawyer answers: maybe. I don’t know enough about the specific amended terms or their data breach. Courts sometimes enforce adhesion contacts and sometimes don’t. But retroactive in and of itself isn’t illegal; for example, if you could edit NOT retroactively settle a dispute, you’d have no settlement agreements.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Lawyer here: this isn’t necessarily correct and in America it’s state dependent. There are absolutely parts of the law you can waive, including negligence of a party which is likely your bungee jumping scenario with the rope snapping.

view more: next ›