keegomatic

joined 1 year ago
[–] keegomatic@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Got a source? When I first read about this people were cautiously optimistic partly because the head researcher was well-respected.

[–] keegomatic@kbin.social 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

our compound shows greatly consistent x-ray diffraction spectrum with the previously reported structure data

Uhh, doesn’t look like it to me. This paper’s X-ray diffraction spectrum looks pretty noisy compared to the one from the original paper, with some clear additional/different peaks in certain regions. That could potentially affect the result. I was under the impression from the original paper that a subtle compression of the lattice structure was pretty important to formation of quantum wells for superconductivity, so if the X-ray diff isn’t spot on I’ll wait for some more failures before calling it busted.

[–] keegomatic@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m not saying this to be an asshole, because I’m happy that you got to the right conclusion eventually, but I have to clarify for history’s sake: if you thought Trump was playing 4D chess in 2015-2016 then you were being duped. Most of us understood what he was from the get-go. Claims of 4D chess have always been stupid.

Again, I’m happy that you figured it out. Everyone makes mistakes. But “we” didn’t think he was playing 4D chess. The hypothesis about Musk/Twitter above is hardly the same.

[–] keegomatic@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Down by the bay
Where the watermelons grow
Back to my home
I dare not go
For if I do
My mother will say
“Have you ever seen a deer crushing a beer?”
Down by the bay

[–] keegomatic@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

This really is true. Experiencing it now, myself.

[–] keegomatic@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, interesting! Thanks for pointing that out. Side note: entries… I hope kbin adopts better language for what to call Reddit-like posts (articles), Twitter-like microblog posts (posts), and comments (entries?). I never would have guessed entries == comments. Maybe this is ActivityPub-specific naming? It reminds me of a past job where we surfaced internal technical names as the names of products and features… it just confused customers.

[–] keegomatic@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Not a kbin thing… might be an extension though. I’m on kbin and no automatic mention was added to the top of this comment when I replied to you.

view more: ‹ prev next ›