francisco

joined 1 year ago
[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

This somehow reminds me of the plastic industry ploy to discredit cork stoppers and thus get wine with plastic stoppers. ---- No. No, the production of cork does not require the killing of the cork oak tree.

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'ma gonna need a better source for that, k !?..

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Same content on archive.ph.

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Great post! Thanks for this.

"Ninety percent of the world doesn’t need to reduce their [personal] emissions, but most readers of The Washington Post probably do,”

*same article on archive.is.

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks! And that is a very fair point.

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm not sure I understand your stand. Are u implying nuclear power stations should be made even if not profitable?

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago

Somehow I always think of the migrant boats crossing the Mediterranean. I hope events are unrelated.

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Will look for that city nerd.

Fuel is heavily subsidized, trains are not.

How do these subsidies work, that the rail companies cannot tap into those. The electrified trains have most of their electricity coming from fossil fuels which would benefit from the same subsidies.

I feel that an optimised engine on a low friction track carrying 500-1000 people should be orders of magnitude cheaper than a car.

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did not know that. Thanks for the info.

It still surprises me that a 300km train ticket costs about the same per person as taking a car with 2 people paying fuel and highway tolls. A 600 seat optimized 'car' on a dedicated low friction track should be, maybe, 100x cheaper.

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yes, you make some very valid points on underestimating the costs of a car. But even at 50c/km, that compares with 10c/(km.person) on a train. On the other side of the competition, long/medium distance trains are more expensive than airplanes. What's up with that? Look at France legislating to favour trains. So I ask myself if it is even possible to get around those centralisation issues with a more DIY fashion.

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Yea, urban trains can work really well. With somewhat overlapping services.

But for longer distances i don't really understand why today's fares are higher than using a car share between 2 people. I've seen that kind of pricing weirdness in Portugal, Spain, England and France, and that does not sound efficient at all.

[–] francisco@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In a lot of places the words 'tea' and 'infusion' are used interchangeably. Might be that..

view more: ‹ prev next ›