Wooster

joined 2 years ago
[–] Wooster@startrek.website 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This just makes me sad that we’ll probably never see the Rogue Leader games ever again

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 72 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I swear, Texas’s grid is the sort of thing that would’ve been written out of a dystopian novel for being too cartoonishly evil.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 2 points 9 months ago

Huh… I wonder if the Borg Corgi is a homage to the “Ensign Sue Must Die” saga, which featured a Borg Beagle.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 20 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I question how much of this is a logistics issue, vs how much of this is because half the population is convinced that basic medical care causes Down syndrome .

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 6 points 9 months ago

Mm… again not a lawyer, but I think that question goes beyond the scope of the document.

It basically gives the government permission to hold renters accountable for using software to artificially raise prices. What form that accountability takes is not addressed. Either that’s covered under existing collusion laws or is up to the courts.

So, it’s an essential ingredient to the cake that you’re describing… but unless prosecution (or whatever the term actually is) brings that up (I assume?), it won’t happen.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 15 points 9 months ago

The joint legal brief clarifies that it is indeed collusion. And continues to explain how this is a technological evolution of the handshake.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 48 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I just read the joint legal brief, and, I have to say up front that I am not remotely a lawyer… but the document specifies how and where to identify price fixing, and that motions to dismiss those charges are to be dismissed.

So it doesn't dictate the penalties for price fixing (I assume that's on a trial by trial basis—but again, not a lawyer), but it makes it impossible(?) to ignore, and suggests that (to me), users of 'RENTMaximizer' will be in the crosshairs… while not actually stating that.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

An exceptional shortfall in hydropower due to extreme droughts in the US, China, and several other economies resulted in over 40% of the rise in emissions in 2023 as countries turned largely to fossil fuels to plug the gap.

I’m honestly surprised Hydro (or rather lack thereof) accounted for that much of the difference.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"I think the biggest concerns are that people elsewhere forget about us and they think, 'Oh they're just the conservative state, and they're all country bumpkins. Don't worry it will never happen here.'

"And the next thing you know, it is happening in other states that are ultra-conservative."

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But why not just reverse the polarity of the primary power coupling?

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

I appreciate this level-headed take from someone knowledgeable on the topic. It's very easy to get riled up over the issue in Gaza, and it's important to discern where certain actions are sanctioned or not.

That said, I suspect there were better ways to deescalate the issue on Girl Scouts' end. Threatening litigation over a contentious humanitarian issue is begging for bad publicity. But, I'm not privy to the exchanges that brought it to that level.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 10 points 10 months ago

IMO, it’s more a consequence of a black & white morality. Nuance isn’t even a blip on the radar. I guarantee they aren’t considering the ramifications, and wouldn’t understand them if explained.

view more: ‹ prev next ›