Tamo240

joined 9 months ago
[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

'Xitter' is pronounced 'Shitter' and is common a playful joke

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pretty sure you already can't block him specifically, I'm not on Xitter but have heard from several people this is the case.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the exact metaphor I've been using when talking to people about the issue. Did we both get it from somewhere I can't remember, or is it just perfect?

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 26 points 2 weeks ago

Binary Large OBject

Basically any binary file, often objected to in open source repos because of the lack of source and 'openness'. See also the recent xz backdoor.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

It also doesn't run off battery power, hardly apples to apples.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 6 points 4 weeks ago

Presumably it will come back as some free-to-play, live-service microtransaction-filled nightmare that can be supported by a few whales and eventually make up the cost

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

The Internet Archive does not create shareholder value

/s

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Nobody is attacking your free choice, they're literally trying to give you another option. That's what free choice is all about.

If you are making an informed devision to remain with windows as it gets worse and worse, then that is up to you, but don't come at people for trying to offer you an alternative just because you've made that decision.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Bit weird to be so angry about this. The commenter is not 'basically just another marketer' because they have nothing (financial or otherwise) to gain from others using linux. They genuinely believe it is a better product and it is in your interests to use it.

Direct your anger at Microsoft if you feel as though you are being forced to do anything, they the ones choosing to enshitify Windows, and removing it as a viable option.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

pendant

pedant?

Sorry

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

Making a platform that was simply a copy of all of Steam's features would certainly take a lot of time. That's why to break into the space a new platform would need to actually innovate a killer feature that brings early adopters to it even without having all the bells and whistles Steam has. Then the user base can and will grow as you fill in the gaps so the 'sacrifice' of using your platform is lessened.

All exclusive games do is build resentment in your customers at being forced to use an inferior product.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

The point is that Epic complaining about being unable to compete with Steam, and therefore needing to employee anti-competitive, anti-consumer practices rings a little hollow given that they have significantly more resources available.

I'm not here to stan for either company, I think if Epic wants to compete they need to create a better product, not fling monopoly accusation while actively pursuing monopolistic strategies.

view more: next ›