Not if they didn't remove any comments
LeninsOvaries
joined 2 days ago
Man goes to the doctor.
He says "Doctor, I am miserable. I have been banned from one of my favourite Lemmy instances for no good reason."
Doctor says "Treatment is simple. db0 runs a community for disputing wrongful bans. Go argue with strangers. That should pick you up."
"But, Doctor..." says the man, "I was banned by db0."
That's too hard for the average Lemmy user. They need a mod to tell them what to think instead of reading comments.
Luigi would be a hero if he were the guy who did it
Luigi wouldn't hurt a fly.
Nah, mods can just lie in the modlog. Verify that shit, don't listen to someone just because they're an authority.
Unless they're a .ml admin. The admins of lemmy.ml are always perfect.
You can block tiktok's domains at the router DNS level. At least then they can't watch it on the home wifi.
We have taken parents rights away to allow children to make decisions on their gender and name changes, yet we expect parent to be responsible for their actions like accessing porn.
That's not a contradiction. Gender and name are about who the child is. Porn is about who the child wants to imagine having sex with. One of them, 99% of children are perfectly capable of making a good decision on. One of them can potentially be traumatising, and certainly isn't absolutely necessary for a good life and healthy development.
That said, it's not the government's job to control it. An "I am 18" button and a lesson in health class are enough.
If porn sites must be legislated, here's a better way: force them to display information to users on unrealistic depictions, the dangers of underage sex, and counselling resources.
Yeah, it's weird. It is incredibly difficult to see someone who's shown that level of vulnerability to you as an equal. For 99% of their relationship, he hasn't really been a person. That's not the foundation of a respectful relationship.
Yes. She spent a decade wiping his ass because he was in a vegetative state, then fucks him a couple weeks after his miraculous recovery.
A doctor should consider carefully whether they could be exploiting the trust, knowledge and dependence that developed during the doctor-patient relationship before they decide whether to pursue or engage in a relationship with a former patient.
When deciding whether a doctor used the doctor-patient relationship to engage in a sexual relationship with a former patient, the Board will consider a range of factors including:
the duration, frequency and type of care provided by the doctor; for example, if they had provided long-term emotional or psychological treatment
the degree of vulnerability of the patient
the extent of the patient’s dependence in the doctor-patient relationship
the time elapsed since the end of the professional relationship
the manner in which, and reason why, the professional relationship ended or was terminated
the context in which the sexual relationship started.
https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/codes-guidelines-policies/sexual-boundaries-guidelines.aspx
Isn't The New Order the one where the nurse has sex with her former patient? That's not ethical...
view more: next ›
Absolutely correct, comrade. And what happened? We leftists told everyone Kamala is evil, and the people listened to us and didn't vote Democrat. We got Trump into the white house. And then the Democrats realised that they need to appeal to the left to win next time. So they've cleaned up their act and taken genocide off the agenda. And now they're actually stopping Trump's fascism. He'll be impeached any day now!