I don't think so, he failed miserably to the separatists and has done nothing remarkable so far, so he had been rather forgotten; he is not a good martyr.

The media and nationalists focused it on one man, but the amnesty is for thousands of protesters (almost all peaceful) prosecuted for crimes as serious and absurd as rebellion. There is a reason why several human rights organizations have been denouncing for some time that the right to demonstrate is under threat.

Definitely

It’s a bit of an aberration. It would be as if in America, the democrats had less senators than the republicans (but both sides short of a majority) and instead decided to ally themselves with American native parties to give them swaths of land and recognise their independence. It wouldn’t be “wrong” but it is a deeply cynical move. (Context, in their agreement with the Basque Country they are essentially giving more autonomy and allowing them to essentially have their own foreign policy, tantamount to recognising independence. Regarding Catalonia they not only supported the amnesty, but also a parliamentary debate on the possibility of checking if it’s constitutional to eventually think about doing a referendum on Catalonian independence) (also, they didn’t even secure a budget agreement, they just agreed to invest Sanchez as a prime minister, so they could fail every budget he tries to pass)

Edit: clarified indigenous parties for American native parties