this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
43 points (70.5% liked)

Futurology

2609 readers
13 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marius@feddit.org 98 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The post headline is BS. It's 70% more efficient than other thermoelectric materials. Not compared to current compressor fridges. Also no device ever can be powered by its ambient temperature, because thermodynamics says no

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Thanks it got me confused, seemed so good that it had to be false but the title was also not very clickbaity.

Edit: opened the article anyway, this is the actual title above the article: Thin film thermoelectric cooling built with semiconductor process technology

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think the userbase of a community being clueless enough to tend to upvote anything vaguely good-sounding is a big factor in me eventually deciding to unsubscribe from that community. It doesn't seem like it is a fixable problem once it develops.

[–] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

It's a big problem with reddit like forums where the comments are highlighted and much more densely presented than the article itself.

Older forums avoided this (unintentionally) by not having any sorting on replies and keeping the density of replies, low.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Hey, it works for the Voyager Space probes! 😏

[–] protist@mander.xyz 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Looking forward to a Technology Connections video debunking all these claims

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

He already did. "Thermoelectic cooling: It's not great."

"There's just one little issue with this technology. It's not very good. Like, at all."

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

TL;DR one side gets hot, while the other gets not very cold

So in order for the very hot side to not heat up the cold side, negating the cooling effect, you have to have a whole water cooled noctua 480mm fan assembly cooling that 2 cm*2 surface, just so that thingy can get to like 10C

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 5 days ago

Also, it's by definition impossible for it to have better than 100% cooling efficiency, which is already the norm for refrigeration-cycle-driven machines.

There are niche applications where it can be the right answer, but no amount of improvement to this specific technology will ever make this as good as existing refrigerators.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I was looking at the thumbnail and wondering if it was these. Yeah, imma go with Alec on this one.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (3 children)

These are just Peltier cooling mechanisms highly refined it seems. If they've increased the efficiency enough that a full-sized refrigerator can keep food cool without refrigerant or a constant electrical signal, that's huge. AFAIK Peltier coolers still need some electrical input, though minimal.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Peltier is horribly inefficient though.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Efficient enough to run a fan from the heat of my woodstove, so it's got that going for it. And there are 12V coolers people keep in their cars. How efficient does it need to be? If they've improved on standard peltier junctions, maybe it is worth it. Why so negative?

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've used 12v coolers. They don't cool, at best they maintain temp, under the right conditions.

How efficient does it have to be? It needs to at least equal compressors.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They suck and die all the time. It's a money grab upgrade like paint protection coating.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CnMRePtHMZY

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These aren't the same thing as a proper Peltier mechanism as you'd expect it to be implemented with a quality build. These are cheaply built evaporative coolers, not an industrial design.

I've deployed industrial units for outdoor enclosures that run on solar with no battery in places that get up to 115F during the day and do decrease the temp of an enclosure by 15-25F. They aren't cheap, but they do work better than those shitty things referenced in your link.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

That's cool. Figured there had to be an industrial option which is always costly. So as soon as cost comes down for consumer grade that'll be nice.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 4 points 6 days ago

You don't need a peltier for that, a woodstove- stirling engine -powered fan would do just fine.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm calling bullshit. There's no way a Peltier element can exceed the coefficient of performance of the refrigeration cycle, at an affordable price, without turning the room into a hothouse.

[–] Lugh@futurology.today 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’m calling bullshit.

Their findings were published in the peer-reviewed journal, Nature.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59698-y

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm not questioning the findings. I'm questioning the article, and your interpretation to arrive at such a summary.

APL plans to continue to partner with organizations to refine the CHESS thermoelectric materials with a focus on boosting efficiency to approach that of conventional mechanical systems

energy-harvesting technologies for applications ranging from computers to spacecraft

70% improvement in efficiency in a fully integrated refrigeration system.

It's all potential, and possibilities, and future projections. I'm sure someone will find real world applications for it, but a fridge tacked out with Peltier tiles that draws energy from its ambient environment (while actively ruining the thermal gradient by the way) is ludicrous.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Umm, a typical refrigerator cranks out a lot of heat. Why would would this be less efficient than that?

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Check the efficiency of heat pumps.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 6 days ago

Read the paper, it's linked below. This is solid state, there's no refrigerant. Heat pumps are efficient, and this IS a heat pump, which is far more efficient than the old school heat pump that uses a 'refrigeration cycle'. I'm with you on being skeptical, and it may be a long time from 'discovery' to production of a saleable device, but this IS a legit significant breakthrough.

Modern refrigerators only generate heat through the capture by refrigerant inside and the pump circulating air. Without those, it's a different story. A Peltier cooling device works similarly, but I can see it being more efficient overall since you would know where the heat ends up. Think car radiator or CPU heatsink. Same basic concept.

[–] Lugh@futurology.today 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

without refrigerant

Yes, they say this does away with the need for compressors or refrigerants.

"This cools by using electrons to move heat through specialized semiconductor materials, eliminating the need for moving parts or challenging coolant liquids."

Yes, that's a Peltier device by definition. The efficiency of them as of now are not great, so the big news here, if reproducible is that they've refined a process that gets them up to 70%.

Huge if true.

[–] KnightontheSun@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't mind Samsung TVs, but it'd be a cold day in hell before I ever buy a Samsung appliance. They are shite.

[–] adhocfungus@midwest.social 4 points 6 days ago

I was not aware of this and bought a Samsung washer and dryer set a few years ago. Noticed one day that the dryer would keep spinning after the cycle ended. Then noticed that it started spinning before I turned the dryer on. I quickly realized that it now spins any time the door is shut, even when off.

Looked online and this is apparently a known mechanical bug in several models due to cheap components. So I can either unplug it or keep the door open anytime it's not in use. Never buying another Samsung either.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Energy efficiency sounds pretty woke to me.

Edit: for those down voting me; Trump Plans to Axe Decades-Old Energy Star Efficiency Program

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

But how will the poor energy companies profit?!?

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Fridges are insanely efficient as it is. Can't wait to see what else this can be used for.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Now if Samsung could only figure out the mysterious science behind making ice.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

This would be fucking insane if true and gets scalable. If Samsung has the tech though those assholes are going to upcharge it to a luxury item and we'll never see it.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago