this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
177 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
2011 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 94 points 3 months ago (2 children)

More data rot. I wonder how many millions of links are about to disappear.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I really hope nobody used shortened links in href attributes. That would be stupid.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don’t worry. There’s a high chance at least one critical software has a shortened link somewhere in their infrastructure.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

But, that's what I am worried about.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

oh, god! quick! somebody contact boeing!

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if there's some service that gave out shortened links by default and people just used those everywhere. Lots of people are clueless about how URLs work, and authoring HTML often means filling in a form.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

authoring HTML often means filling in a form.

What, like, DreamWeaver style? Sounds cray-cray to me (as a web developer).

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm thinking more like using a CMS or Wordpress by people who don't consider themselves developers.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Ah, right. Yeah...

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

On this planet, it seems that there is nothing so stupid that you won't find someone doing it, alas.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

You know it to be true. This is the way.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

as if millions of ~~voices~~ ~~links~~ voices cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

[–] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 60 points 3 months ago

Every month Google reminds us not to depend on their services.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Land_Strider@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I skim this page every time it is posted, but this time scrolling the whole length of it even as fast as I can gave me depression. 295 projects, almost half of them killed in the last 5 years.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think any other company is based on trial and error to the same degree as Google.
It's kind of funny, since Google was originally based on hiring the greatest capacities within their field. So you should think they were pretty smart.
But trial and error is actually the LEAST INTELLIGENT method to solve a problem.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think they’re mostly doing it to get the attention of investors. New products are exciting. It shows the company is growing.

Look at our new self driving car we will definitely release within the next year! Or how about these stupid looking glasses?

But now investors have become more concerned about profitability, so most tech companies are focusing on cutting the costs.

[–] palordrolap@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A combination of browser settings and exceptionally rare usage of short link providers - as creator or user - means I'm not completely sure about this, but ... were they putting ads on the short links somehow?

Because I figure if they weren't they should have tried that.

And if they were, how expensive is running a short link service anyway? This feels like rummaging around in the sofa for loose change. Smacks of desperation.

[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

I suspect that they build a profile of what websites you visit and sell that data for targeted advertising.

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 30 points 3 months ago

Who could have foreseen this

[–] hahattpro@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So goo.le no longer work ?

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Massive link rot incoming

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 months ago

goo.gle will continue to work beyond 2025

goo.gl will not

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

I've only ever seen goog.le looks used in spam and phishing emails, so I'm not particularly sad about this

Of course, there's roughly eighty million other folks who think they've each done a short link provider better, somehow, so this won't make much of a difference beyond not relying on the bots at Google to deal with abuse problems.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They have one? I just use tinyurl.