this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
43 points (92.2% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
587 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Universities

πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
43
Stop Killing Games Canadian Petition - Now Open For Signature (www.ourcommons.ca)
submitted 5 months ago by recursive_recursion@programming.dev to c/canada@lemmy.ca
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.giftedmc.com/post/441893

Stop Killing Games Canadian Petition - Now Open For Signature

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/20896275

Stop Killing Games Canadian Petition - Now Open For Signature

Petition E-4965 is the one that is posted to stopkillinggames.com, Ross Scott (Accursed Farms)'s campaign to end the practice of bricking games people have purchased, whenever the publisher doesn't want to support it anymore.

It is open for signing by Canadian Citizens and Permanent Residents, until September 5th 2024.

Please spread the word to your Canadian friends and family who take interest in games, and please add your name to it to support this campaign to help preserve games in some form in perpetuity.

Thank you!

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Pass legislation requiring publishers that sell or license video games or that sell related features and assets for said games to do the following once they end support for said games: leave their games in a functional state, and remove any mandatory connections to the publisher or affiliated parties necessary for said games to function;

How enforceable is this legislation in face of games that simply cannot function without multiplayer? The developers of a game similar to Among Us would be forced to update the game with bots to be compliant?

I signed the petition but can't say I'm hopeful the Parliament will write good legislation on this...

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The developers of a game similar to Among Us would be forced to update the game with bots to be compliant?

I'm not a programmer or IT specialist or anything but I think the ask would be more like,

when discontinuing multiplayer service they must roll out an update to allow gamers to specify private server addresses

They don't need to program bots, they need to open the code enough for fans to keep the game functional. Like when I was a kid I could play multi player games with my friends by typing their phone number into the game. Our computers would connect through the phone lines and we could battle for the fate of Azeroth. I still remember the phone number of the friend I did that with.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

they need to open the code enough for fans to keep the game functional

That makes sense. Another commenter pointed out that even for defunct MMORPGs people were able to spin up their own servers to keep the game alive. If companies are forced to provide something to help that, it's already a win.

I'm not hopeful Canada would be able to pass legislation forcing companies to open source things, though. Maybe if this was the EU lol our track record of fighting tech companies hasn't been pretty.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It would probably just result in games not being for sale in Canada.

Maybe a progressive tax, not a ban, eg if your game grosses say $1M sales in Canada you pay a higher tax rate if you don't attest that you've set aside enough cash to do this when you sunset the game. Then if you said you'd do it but don't, the CRA can come after you. Revenue from this tax could be earmarked for computer education or indie studio grants or something.

[–] knitwitt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That sounds like a nightmare! I don't think game developers (or any other artist) would want the CRA breathing down their neck, telling them what they can or can't do with their work. I certainly wouldn't program under those conditions.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

... then just pay the higher tax rate? You already grossed a million dollars in sales.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Open sourcing it is the solution but there is no enforcement possible

Studios can just shut down unless they are required to hand the source over to enter the market

[–] knitwitt@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This would be an issue if the servers use any proprietary code, libraries, or services the developer is not at liberty to distribute.

A studio may also to reuse their networking code for a sequel, and it would suck being forced to release that just because an older title got discontinued - could lead to exploits, or just competitors profiting off of your hard work with no compensation in exchange.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They could just keep the game running to avoid that

But if the source isn’t available then the game will eventually be lost

[–] brenticus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I feel the same way regarding whether this legislation would be enforceable or good, but there are a lot of ways developers could make this work that they currently don't. That includes bot players, local multiplayer functionality, dedicated server tools, IP-based connections, etc. Many DRM and anti-cheat implementations also cause problems and would need to be either removed or only used in certain contexts.

Right now in a lot of games if you aren't playing multiplayer on official servers through official matchmaking functions with invasive kernel-level anti-cheat there's no other way to play, but that hasn't always been the case nor does it need to be the case.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Publish the source. Look at id and Quake/Quakeworld. The game is still alive and well after Romero released all source codes to let people iterate their own clients and servers.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You pose a good question. There are many ways that it can be implemented and of course it depends on the game. Have a solo/offline mode, replace online multiplayer with local multiplayer or direct connect (for games like Among Us), release a dedicated server (so groups of people can start their own.

At a minimum, it needs to be better than "Could not reach game server, please check your connection and try again." The standard we could hold companies to would be through each province's consumer rights agency, but would have the legislation properly behind their efforts.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I imagine it being basically impossible for MMORPG games. How do you keep an MMORPG alive without removing the MMO part?

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are player-run servers for MMORPGs such as Ultima Online and EverQuest. If the developers released the server software the fans wouldn’t have to implement their own (which they did for those two games). If the company is no longer running their own servers they are no longer making money from subscriptions so they won’t lose money to competition from player-run servers.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

fans wouldn’t have to implement their own (which they did for those two games)

Wow, TIL. People are amazing.

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Please consider signing the petition as this might be our real chance at stopping publishers from permanently killing online games✊

[–] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Signed it!

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Signed, here's hoping it goes through!

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can’t sign for Canada, but i can up vote this post to get more visibility, maybe.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Your moral support is appreciated. I'm glad my original post is getting around. If you have any Aussie or British friends please get them to these petitions too!

[–] cmeow@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thank you, OP. Only took a couple mins to fill it out and verify my email. Easiest civic work I've ever had the pleasure of doing.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

It was very quick, aside from waiting a bit for the email to arrive.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Accursed Farms

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] knitwitt@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I'm not comfortable with the idea of the government dictating what developers must do with their games. There are legitimate legal, financial, and artistic reasons they may not want to be forced to distribute in that way.

I think that it's the responsibility of consumers to make sure they have the level of ownership over the games they like. I personally don't really like to invest into live service games for this reason, but I do enjoy playing them on occasion and appreciate that they're free to play and receive constant updates. Forcing the Deves to open source their code at the end of the game's life cycle would jeopardize their vision and our ability to play games like them.