this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
95 points (97.0% liked)

Games

16440 readers
524 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
95
Irate Escape from Tarkov players nuke community Discord over new PvE mode (www.dexerto.com)
submitted 5 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 68 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Why? Why would this be something that upsets them?

Ah, ok:

Escape from Tarkov players are irate with developer Battlestate Games after it announced the release of a new edition, with a new mode and a $250 price tag, as they believe they should get it for free for purchasing the season pass.

Players who purchased the previous Edge of Darkness Edition were promised future DLC content as part of paying for the season pass. The community thinks the new Unheard Edition – which comes with a heavy price tag, what they believe is pay-to-win in-game content, and the new PvE mode – falls under DLC.

Carry on then

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The problem isn’t that it’s pay to play, it’s that they already paid to play and they don’t want to pay again

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

And let's not ignore the absolutely batshit bananas bonkers price tag. $250 for one new mode in an existing game?

I need to know where the execs that greenlit this get their cocaine. They must be getting amazing prices to get enough to make that seem like a reasonable idea.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Nikita has a history of bad ideas but this one takes the cake hands down, and in normal Nikita fashion.. his response is fuck you im gonna do what I want and you can’t do anything about it.

I long ago tired of Nikitas antics and stopped playing tarkov since he kept making it worse and worse with the excuse of fighting cheaters instead of just joining up with an effective anti-cheat company. Also the fact they put the game on sale IMMEDIATELY after every ban wave is just too obvious

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They are Russian, so it’s probably a mix of vodka and amphetamines.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

That combined with the ever increasing desperation to stay relevant so they don’t fall into Putin’s bad graces and all get conscripted.

[–] reflex@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago

They are Russian, so it’s probably a mix of vodka and amphetamines.

Do svidanya. Vodka soda.

[–] Chickenslippers@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

They probably were confident people would buy it since almost everyone that plays the game has the 150 dollar edition for all the pay to win aspects. I've never seen another game where so much of the player base had the most expensive edition of the game

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -2 points 5 months ago

That purchasing variation was also thought as an opportunity that wasn't going to pop up again.

(I aim to not say the fifthglyph for all days to promote !avoid5@sh.itjust.works)

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 23 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Woah they NUKED it, is that like almost as hard as SLAMS?

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In my experience, that or "raid" is actually how people commonly describe this type of event

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think you've nailed why the headline bothers me. Nuked would be deleted whereas here they've swamped them with criticism. Tarkov players raided, the developers nuked in response.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Like somebody else said, it’s a pretty common term for mass deleting posts and/or kicking users, as well as just deleting shit in general. If I was dual booting Linux and Windows, then finally decided to remove Windows I would say I “nuked my Windows partition”, or if I were to overwrite all my reddit comments before deleting my old account I would say I “nuked my reddit account”.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but the players aren't deleting stuff, they're spamming complaints and using bots to do so.

The developers may be nuking their own service to clean up, but that's not what the title says.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Oh my bad, yeah that actually is an atrocious title. I could see “carpet bomb” instead of nuke, but after realizing the context and my misinterpretation of the title yeah it’s fucking terrible.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Eh if they are dedicated enough I bet a group could get a channel removed for breaking too many user agreement rules

[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

They fucking OBLITERATED IT

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I think it's more than dragged, but less than slammed.