this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7144 readers
296 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago

Shareholder profits must be maintained, even at the cost of public safety.

[–] tarsn@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Unions are trying to recover lost wages because their last agreements were signed before the latest round of high inflation. Going to be lots of strikes in the next few years because of course employers don't want to pay

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

CN says recent regulatory changes have made it harder to find crews and necessitated a "modernization of the compensation model."

CPKC says it has been negotiating in good faith since September and offered compensation boosts and more schedule predictability, but that the railway and the union "remain far apart on the issues."

Any industry people around to confirm if these claims are as BS as they sound? CN taking breaks away is self-explanatory I guess, but I get the feeling CPKC's "predictability" of shift scheduling with "compensation boosts" means more hours and/or regular overtime. Obviously they could hire more people if the job was made more attractive, but I highly doubt they want more people. I expect they just want to squeeze more out of fewer people, as usual.