this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
107 points (91.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43803 readers
742 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Suppose there are two employees: Alice and Bob, who do the same job at the same factory. Alice has a 10 minute (20RT) commute, Bob commutes 35 minutes(70RT).

If you're the owner of the factory, would you compensate them for their commutes? How would you do it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't do it for time I'd do it for distance

And I'd have a cap for compensation for distance

I'd probably also offer a percentage coverage for monthly public transit passes to encourage workers to use public transit more

[โ€“] lntl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Now Alice and Bob both live 10 miles away. Alice drives a GMC Yukon Denali and Bob rides his bicycle. Since Alice's commute is more expensive, should she be compensated at a higher rate than Bob?

[โ€“] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

No, they both get compensated for 10 miles and if they bring proof of purchasing a transit pass for the month a percentage reimbursement

[โ€“] Billy_Gnosis@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No. It's not the employers fault that Alice spent more money on her mode of transportation.

This is why paying people for their commute is unreasonable. Payment by mileage is based fuel costs mostly. Some wear and tear, but mainly it's to offset the fuel cost. If someone rides a bike to work, they don't have fuel costs, therefore should not be compensated.

[โ€“] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

No, that's Alice's problem.

[โ€“] mypasswordistaco@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my country the cap is at 12 km I think. So within that distance from work no one gets compensation. Beyond that distance, everyone can get compensation. Motorcycle, car, and train get the same per km compensation, and bike/moped/scooter get a slightly lower ammount. If you have to travel over 60 km (one way) the per km ammount goes up.

Compensation is normally in the form of a tax deduction, but some companies have their own compensation schemes where they pay you for travel. If you get paid this way there's no tax.

[โ€“] Suoko@feddit.it -1 points 1 year ago

You know nobody considers Denmark (or any other northern European countries) as a sample that can be imitated by the rest of the world. We have super politicians who think about flying cars, they're projected into the impossible future