Asklemmy

43502 readers

1427 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Meta's Threads twitter competitor is now live... what do you think? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 year ago by esty@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

i know the fediverse has been pretty split and a lot of big instances (mainly microblogging and mastodon-like softwares, but some lemmy instances are defederating meta too) but what do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Knightfall@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

I can't tell if Bluesky is any better. I mean, morally. I'm unsure myself. I'm on the waiting list for Bluesky.

There are a lot of news items about Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk still being friends and helping each other out, even to this day. I'm still trying to filter my findings to learn what is fact or fiction.

But there is a chance if one doesn't like Threads because it is owned by Meta, then using Bluesky may be a hypocritical choice. Not sure yet.