this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
484 points (98.8% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2398 readers
81 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson has ignited outrage over the state of U.S. healthcare.

While his murder shocked many, online reactions highlighted public frustration with private insurers, citing denied care, high costs, and systemic bureaucracy.

UnitedHealthcare, a major industry player, has faced scrutiny for practices perceived as prioritizing profit over patients.

The attack, which appears premeditated, underscores rising tensions around healthcare inequality.

Experts see this as part of a broader trend toward violence over societal disputes, reflecting deep dissatisfaction with the American healthcare system.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Option 1's incremental improvement to healthcare are negated by capitalism's incremental exploitation of those "improvements." They can fuck shit up faster than politics can fix it.

Option 2 ends in universal healthcare.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

We didn’t even try Option 1 this time. It was too boring for most people to go out and vote. And then we had a vocal group decided to withhold votes based on their unbending principles.

I’m not holding my breath for Option 2 given we couldn’t even make Option 1 work. Since we’ve shown we can’t come together for each other, Option 2 is more likely to end in totalitarianism as the powerful react to the violence and/or in societal collapse as every person looks out only for himself.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's go ahead and not even pretend that any kind of healthcare reform would have happened during a Dick Cheney approved Harris administration.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I suppose we could pretend both sides are the same instead.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

We don't have to pretend lol

We been getting fucked since raygoon

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We didn’t even try Option 1 this time.

What exactly the fuck do you think four years of Biden was?

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Rita Mae Brown

And then the fucking neolibs wonder why Trump won.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Just because there are other options worth trying, doesn’t mean we should give up on also trying a peaceful option. If we elect better people, it’s not the same thing. If we strike, too, it’s not the same thing. Nonviolent interference is not doing the same thing. We can augment rather than abandon. It’s more complicated, harder, and requires cunning and patience rather than mere brute force. Nothing has a guaranteed result, not even violence—especially with GOP/MAGA in power. All of the tools are more effective when not under Republican rule.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

lol. god people are trash. 'suffer for longer because we want to take the HARDER route vs fixing the fucking problem.' enjoy the violence you've mandated; its just a shame everyone else is going to have to suffer with you.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We didn’t even try Option 1 this time.

Option 1 was "maintain the status quo". Continue to suck in exactly the same way that we have been sucking for the past 60+ years.

as every person looks out only for himself.

That's called "Democracy".

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it’s not obvious to you that things sucked in distinctly different ways under Democrat and GOP rule, I doubt I’ll be able to convince you. Not to mention, the stark difference this next administration has from anything we’ve seen before.

If you don’t think we’ve ever made progress in this country, or that the Biden administration made only maintained the status quo, I guess that’s fine. You do you. But that’s not the case from what I’ve seen.

I am interested in how democracy is every person looking out for themselves. I can agree that any societal system has to account for self-preservation, but democracy itself is, as far as I understand, a tool to channel individual instincts toward improving things for everyone.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it’s not obvious to you that things sucked in distinctly different ways under Democrat and GOP rule

Sure. There are distinct differences between the two.

There are also distinct differences in the different ways things sucked in the 1920s. There are distinct differences in the way things sucked in the 1980s. The distinctions you are talking about are trivial compared to the distinctions across the decades.

Neither Democrats nor Republicans are currently interested in the kind of reforms necessary to address the oligarchs. The difference in suckiness between the two is certainly distinct, but relatively insignificant. We need to tackle the bigger problems; the problems that Harris wasn't capable or even interested in solving. We know we need to tackle those problems, which is why someone unable and/or unwilling to look at them gets a yawn.

Option 2 gives us an optimistic electorate. That "Yay!" is exactly what we need. The most pressing issue we need to address is Reagan's tax policies. So much is resolved when we restore the measures we used to destroy the robber barons.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

I agree with most, but not all, of your understanding of our situation. Sounds like you want things to get better. I hope your efforts are successful.