this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
242 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
3382 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If even half of Intel's claims are true, this could be a big shake up in the midrange market that has been entirely abandoned by both Nvidia and AMD.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] zqps@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hell yeah 800 bucks for a basic-ass storage option

[โ€“] vzq@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ

For 800 bucks you get nothing worth having there.

But the point is that so far, Intel has not produced anything worth having at any price. And for GPUs, their process node troubles will make it really hard for them to compete on price or on performance.

And that overlooks what Intel is usually super crappy on that NV nailed right out of the gate: developer support.

[โ€“] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I was purely commenting on Apple silicon. As an owner of an M4 MBP I should add. The best chip in the world can still suck as a product if it's held hostage in this fashion. 800 bucks is what Apple charges for 1.5TB added storage.