this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
439 points (98.2% liked)

News

22543 readers
3593 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It seems they do in individual countries but not EU-wide. Not very much though, it says an average of 7.5 cents a can.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social -4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So, that can not explain rise of the price then...

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sugary drink taxes don’t apply to diet sodas either

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Depends on location. In parts of the US like Philadelphia and DC diet sodas absolutely are included in the tax. Meanwhile in Seattle Starbucks beverages were specifically excluded as not being “sugary” because they include milk which makes them “healthy” thanks to a lot of lobbying. I don’t know of any European taxes that function the same way but it has certainly tainted the concept since, like everything, shitty lawmaking ruined the entire point in actual execution.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah where I was living in Seattle diet sodas were exempt from the tax. I do recall that Starbucks thing but that’s a whole other issue.

I live in an EU country now and apparently they’re gonna be rolling out sugary drink taxes soon and I’m not yet clear on whether diet sodas are included but I haven’t looked into it closely yet.

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I was living in the Seattle area when they implemented theirs and that is when I looked into the taxes and found out about Philly including diet soda. I can't find a source now with quick googling but the reason I came across back then was that statistically white middle class consumers drink more diet soda so zero calorie drinks were included in the "sugary" tax to promote equity... while completely destroying the health push that was the very reason for the tax.

Meanwhile diet or not I just wish I could get Mezzo Mix at my local store.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That logic is insanely frustrating. You see it in policy all the time and it drives me crazy.

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

This is why we can’t have nice things…

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I wonder if they will do that with wine as well.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They would probably keep the same cost for diet and non-diet Pepsi and pocket the difference.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Honestly wouldn't surprise me

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Where I've seen such a tax implemented that was not the case. But sure, I wouldn't be surprised if that happened somewhere.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

So you're talking about 14p difference on a large soda.

The bottled stuff, it depends, a lot of it got reduced way the fuck down to limit it or fall under the limit entirely. Honestly, it was a good thing. I genuinely can't stand full sugar soda .. makes my teeth itch.