Enough Musk Spam
For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.
No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.
Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.
Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.
Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.
view the rest of the comments
Unrelated question!
In the phrase "Now he -and his empire- are cracking[...]" as written in the title, should the "are" have been "is" or do the - instead of parenthesis mean we include the empire when we conjugate "to be"?
I think 'are' would be correct despite it looking awkward because it is talking about two separate, but related, things: Musk and Musk's empire.
I am not a grammarian, however.
If two concepts are joined by "and" then prescriptively the article should be "is" not "are". However most US speakers either don't like the sound of that or don't know the difference.
I'm asking because in this discussion case they added the em dashes (didn't know that's what they're called) before and after "and his empire", separating this part from the rest...
In this case they used the dashes for dramatic effect. It's sometimes used to mimic spoken English, in that the cadence of the sentence is changed by the information contained in the dashes. Often, it's replaced by commas in the form of a non-defining relative clause (The man, who lived in the house next to me for many years, was coming to visit). Think of it like a cue to take a pause before saying/reading the information.
Here's a link, if you want to read a bit more: https://writingcommons.org/section/grammar/mechanics/punctuation/dashes/
Interesting, I interpreted it as a replacement for parentheses instead of a step in-between commas and parenthesis.
Always funny how people who learn a second language learn by the rules so much that they sometimes see things that doesn't seem to work that the language speakers don't notice...
Thanks!