this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
317 points (96.8% liked)

News

23305 readers
3723 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As lawmakers around the world weigh bans of 'forever chemicals,” many manufacturers are pushing back, saying there often is no substitute.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] superguy@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How did we ever survive without them?

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not about survival. Manufactures are just letting people know if we ban these chemicals they will need to stop producing some products.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] clegko@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you're OK with EV batteries no longer being made, along with numerous other things?

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's kinda hard to tell. I would need to find a specific list of things that we could no longer produce with the specific laws.

If it's just that we no longer get non-stick pans, I am fine with losing those if we get less cancer.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The list is so long you can't fathom how much it impacts. Pretty much anything with anti- or resistant used to describe it has some sort of PFAS compound. We can live without PFAS, but we would need to do like people used to do and give up a lot of creature comforts.

One thing it's commonly associated with is surfactants, so no fancy shampoo, but also probably no washing machine because it doesn't scour your clothes well enough. Plumbing uses it to join pipes. Any sort of metal finishing/coating uses so no more chrome or nickel plating unless you want it to look like you dug it up at a 500 AD site. One of the higher containing things I've seen was women's make up.

[–] Haywire@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How much less cancer do you prefer from these vs internal combustion cars?

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The point is being missed. We shouldn't use pfas for convenience items like pans and such. If we keep them well contained in EV batteries, that's probably ok.

[–] Haywire@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I concur. Plastic makes great electrical insulation, but not great disposable cups. Petroleum is very versatile feedstock but not a good energy source.

[–] Haywire@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do wonder if cooking in nonstick pans without oil is less risky than cooking with oil in conventional pans.

[–] clegko@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think there's really any measurable difference, assuming the nonstick pan isn't scuffed enough to cause bits and pieces to flake off into your food.

[–] Haywire@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cooking oil decomposes into carcinogens. Especially low smoke point oils.

(Admittedly the increased risk from either is pretty low)

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know. We stop cars, cancer goes away pretty quickly. Forever chemicals are well... Forever.

That is why I need specifics. You deserve specifics too.

[–] Haywire@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

We stop all cars. Build nanomachines to cure cancer and enable cold fusion. Abolish capitalism . It's all so easy.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

There's a great conversation going on under this comment that I totally agree with. There's probably valid uses for which an exception could be made, but these largely do not belong in mass produced consumer goods.

To answer your direct question, though: In a rational world, EVs would not be a thing, or would be a very limited thing for special use cases like farm work or accessibility. They will not solve our problems, only mass transit and better planning can solve things.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We powered our cars with gasoline instead of batteries.

Because without PFAS, we can't make EV batteries.

[–] VonCesaw@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The point of transportation reform isnt to get a new type of car, its to eliminate the need for cars

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Many parts of the world currently depend on cars, and that cannot easily be changed. While it's not impossible, eliminating cars will require a long time. Much longer than the amount of time we have left to avert catastrophic climate change.

[–] VonCesaw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless those electric cars are running on entirely renewable energy, it's a non-positive

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Electric vehicles add demand to the power grid. These days, increased demand is met by increasing renewable energy production (mostly wind turbines). Nobody is building coal plants any more.

[–] Redrum714@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you think personal forms of transportation will ever disappear you are straight up delusional. That’s not “reform” that’s ignorance.

[–] rexxit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed, but social media has become an echo chamber for fuckcars and good luck reasoning with them.