this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
27 points (61.5% liked)

Apple

17264 readers
226 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 181 points 11 months ago (4 children)

If you’re curious how but don’t want to read, I skimmed and it seems like overzealous privacy/permission warnings are at the heart of their complaints. I’d agree, it’s annoying but I prefer it to the alternative.

Creative cloud wanted to run at login, and in the old days, it would just make that happen. Now it implores YOU to turn on the setting because it cannot. That’s a win in my book.

[–] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I swear articles like this were written by companies like Adobe

[–] Streetdog@sh.itjust.works 21 points 11 months ago

Rule #1 in journalism: follow the money.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Asking for permission to access downloads OS fine by me.

But what pisses me off to no end is system integrity protection. Want a new system sound? Have to boot into recovery, turn it off, copy the file, sign your new modified system, then turn it on and reboot.

And every single update will undo your changes.

[–] ahti@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Okay but would you prefer the alternative where anything with root permissions (either apps with privileged helper processes or any pkg you ever installed) can modify the OS in whatever way it likes and permanently and invisibly install some kind of malware/spyware?

[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

While that is good, to many warning pop ups also aren't good. As if you always need to click through 5-7 warnings/permission windows, you might not notice when a bad one sneaks in to the middle.

It's a difficult problem to navigate, especially as you need to have it work for such a big and diverse audience.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

Too many popups is really Windows' issue. It's not that all the bullshit companies do doesn't require you to authorize it; it's that anything you install needs effectively the same permission and you're basically conditioned to ignore it.

Apple's version where it tells you what it wants permission for is much better.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s a theoretical issue. In actuality, I haven’t faced anything close to windows level pop ups. I think Apple has struck the right balance personally and I would definitely not want to go back.

[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

That's really good. I don't personally use Appel for computers, so I never seen how they do it.

[–] _cnt0@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

It's a difficult problem to navigate, especially as you need to have it work for such a big and diverse audience.

That's a very polite way of saying that part of the target audience are idiots.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

You mean stuff like sandboxing and preventing apps from making system changes?