this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
595 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
2187 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm rather curious to see how the EU's privacy laws are going to handle this.

(Original article is from Fortune, but Yahoo Finance doesn't have a paywall)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

How is "don't rely on content you have no right to use" litteraly impossible?

We teach to children that there is a Google filter to include only the CC images (that they should use for their presentations).

Also it's not like we are talking small companies here, a new billion-making industry is being born and it could totally afford contracts with big platforms that would allow to use their content.

[–] stealthnerd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is an article about unlearning data, not about not consuming it in the first place.

LLM's are not storing learned data in it's raw, original form. They are injesting it and building an understanding of language based off of it.

Attempting to peel out that knowledge would be incredibly difficult, if not impossible because there's really no way to identify it.

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And we're saying that if peeling out knowledge that someone has a right to have forgotten is difficult or impossible, that knowledge should not have been used to begin with. If enforcement means big tech companies have to throw out models because they used personal information without knowledge or consent, boo fucking hoo, let me find a Lilliputian to build a violin for me to play.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

If enforcement means big tech companies have to throw out models because they used personal information without knowledge or consent, boo fucking hoo

A) this article isn't about a big tech company, it's about an academic researcher. B) he had consent to use the data when he trained the model. The participants later revoked their consent to have their data used.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)