this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
557 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

58092 readers
3882 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 154 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

If your kids' school laptops are surveilled, they're surveilled by someone. Let's call that someone Joe. Joe is a person who took a low-paying job that lets him surveil your kids. Joe likes his job, because he gets to surveil your kids. He gets to turn on the camera and look in your kids' room. He gets to read the chat messages your kids send to their classmates.

Your kids would be better off without Joe in their lives. Joe is not a source of security. Joe is not protecting your kids; Joe is a threat to them.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 24 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I work IT in schools. There is limited surveillance tools on college owned devices. Mainly logging of web traffic. Screens can be viewed when on campus network, not reachable off campus.

No one in our department has time to waste looking at web history or screens. Teachers don't bother to use it much either. We only look at it when directed by college executive or when I go in there at the end of term to clear the alerts.

I'd imagine most other schools are similar, no one gives a shit what kids are doing on their devices

[–] tutus@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no one gives a shit what kids are doing on their devices

Except Joe. And people like Joe. Whose surveillance of kids is now not only easier, but sanctioned.

[–] IAmNotACat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly. It’s like a tacit admission that the only reason to have this stuff is for people like Joe.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trust me bro, joe is a good guy!

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's super busy! No time to abuse our completely abuseable system...

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

my highschool has 1,500 kids and 2 IT guys. We have over 100 broken laptops rn. They're overworked minimum wage workers like everyone else working at public schools. They don't even look at what kids do. I've seen only 1 story in the 4 years I've been in HS where someone actually got in trouble for messing with stuff on the computer and it was because they were trying to brute force a network password they didn't have access to.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

kids looking at porn on their school laptops is why the tools exist, not for pedos. 'Joe' is 0.001% of people, not the majority!

[–] IAmNotACat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s a number you just made up.

Either way, use a blacklist then. If you really care about what sites they access, use a whitelist.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

use a blacklist then

They do.

That’s a number you just made up.

you're purposefully ignoring my point

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)