lemonmelon

joined 6 months ago
[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Civ IV was peak Civ for me. The changes made going into V just didn't feel like Civ.

Yes, that includes the loss of doomstacks.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Wouldn't it work better in that case? The implication being that if you weren't the only tall person, then staff wouldn't be so short without you.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

In the headline, "pledging to 'murder' shoplifters" is a restrictive participial phrase modifying "texts." Restrictive elements are not offset by commas.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Metal Slug series

Mechwarrior series

Myst

Microsoft Flight Simulator series

Mario Kart series

Mario Party series

Master of Orion series

Marathon series

Mother series

Monster Party

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Executive Decision?

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No.

You can't do that.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If premeditation was a requirement, 2nd degree murder would not exist.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Premeditation isn't required for murder charges.
Malice aforethought is.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Everyone's Sauron Here

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Point of fact, I'm not bobs_monkey, the originator of the rhetorical tone. Fax in healthcare continues to survive well past its prime because there is an inherent loophole: analog data transfer is functionally unsuited to encryption. This allows fax to be operated at a "best effort" level of security. There are handling protocols that are meant to keep traditional fax transmissions as private as possible, but these are layer 8 processes with limited enforceability. Beyond that, traditional fax represents a pathway around requirements on encryption while still meeting HIPAA compliance standards.

FOIP is an improvement, but it still allows for interoperability with a traditional fax machine connected to a POTS line in some GP's office that they're unwilling to part with. That means the FOIP user can only be confident of the transmission being secure on their side. I can't speak to the overall adaptation of FOIP in hospital systems, but I do know that there are non-isolated instances of hospitals still relying on traditional fax as opposed to adopting a cloud-fax solution. Hell, there are still major hospitals using SL-100s as their primary phone switches.

I don't even want to get into codec mismatches, because that falls out of scope when it comes to a privacy discussion.

Long story short, achieving HIPAA compliance is a low bar with regards to fax, and if that were to change I believe we'd see fax disappear (finally!) shortly thereafter.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm not disagreeing with you, but the fax loophole does need to be closed.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's just a "best by" date. You can still eat it, though it might taste a bit stale.

view more: next ›