Squorlple

joined 2 years ago
[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Many AI chatbots or chat assists are by default programmed to be saccharine to the point of disingenuousness. Don’t adjust your values to categorically match what they are programmed to praise or condemn. They appear on the surface as people-pleasers but are actually intended to please their distributor’s investors. Additionally and most critically, don’t fall into the trap of thinking of the machines as people.

With the AI tangent aside, with human interactions I definitely do feel the disparity between coddling and general treatment in society. If you’ve ever seen people interact with young kids or people with disabilities, especially mental disabilities, people often express overvaluing of their actions and creations to boost their confidence. While it may be a great achievement for that individual’s standards and capabilities and they do deserve praise for that much, lauding a simple piece of macaroni art as being better than the Mona Lisa, for example, is probably not genuine and can in fact undermine the creator’s confidence if they are aware enough to sense that lack of genuineness. However, for some people maybe they’d rather have that piece of macaroni art over the Mona Lisa because it is made by someone they love and care about and they highly value tokens of that person. Sometimes it can feel as if there is a conspiracy against someone if they notice a mismatch between the level of praise they receive and their presence and level of success in society elsewhere, and I too have experienced that sensation.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The explanation page doesn’t have anything yet, but this feels like it has references to the Futurama episodes “The Late Philip J. Fry” and “Lethal Inspection”, with just a hint of Slartibartfast from The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

[EDIT: After making this comment, I noticed that those two Futurama episodes happen to be back-to-back with each other. xkcd must be in the middle of watching the series]

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Maybe they got to the dump and there was a big sign and chain across the dump saying “Closed on Thanksgiving” and they had never heard of a dump closed on Thanksgiving before and with tears in their eyes they drove off into the sunset looking for another place to put the garbage. They didn’t find one. ‘Til they came to a side road and off the side of the side road there was another fifteen foot cliff and at the bottom of the cliff was another pile of garbage. And they decided that one big pile is better than two little piles and rather than bring that one up they decided to throw theirs down.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Let’s get the Orb of Confusion effect played on the sphere

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Refer to the first sentence of my comment.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Are you saying you think it’s ok to give a platform to content explicitly promoting genocide and Nazism so long as it has a beat?

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Somebody posted this exact same comic to this community just prior. I don’t think your title is a reference to a small edit that I’m missing? In any case, it might be best for everyone to glance through New on a community before posting non-OC.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Virtually every sentient life experiences a non-zero amount of suffering. Progeny that doesn’t exist categorically doesn’t suffer; progeny that does exist is virtually certain to suffer to some degree. The hedonist argument that progeny may get to experience some joy falls apart because progeny that doesn’t exist categorically doesn’t experience any lack of joy (i.e. that would-be joy is not mourned by that which does not exist).

Ensuring the certainty of the sum total of suffering in another person’s life just for one’s own self-fulfillment is incredibly selfish. Procreation is a cycle of blithe selfishness that perpetuates universal suffering and is at best wrought by apathy for others’ suffering and at worst wrought by enthusiasm for others’ suffering.

I’m anti-kid because I didn’t consent to the sentience that I have experienced and I have the empathy to want others not to suffer.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If reincarnation were real, I’d hope that people who think the meaning of life entails procreation end up getting stuck as mayflies forever

 
[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I wonder how somebody can completely miss their own message like this. Or maybe somebody made an original image and then a techbro made this AI slop as a duplicate to spite them.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 79 points 4 days ago (19 children)

Somebody should really report these MAGA people for their anti-Christian biases

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I would think the underground ones that host content which is horribly abusive and illegal (in ways beyond merely piracy)

 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28963232

Too cynical or too cyclical?

 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28906933

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28906919

The artistry is a bit sloppy but I thought it being rough around the edges was fitting for the message/expression.

Consider the phrase "No one could ever love this creature" repeated 28 times to be a form of poetry.

I feel bad for the innocent worm that is forever entwined in this.

 
 
 

What are your favorite search engine alternatives? Ideally no ads or favored content, and with various useful filters

 
view more: next ›