NeatNit

joined 8 months ago
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'll take your advice even further: I won't even try to look up what a "discord kitten" even is.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago

Wow. Only desperate marketing would call that a function.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 5 days ago (5 children)

The page says two functions, what's the second one?

(and to all smart-asses out there: what's the first one?)

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

This was the topic of an episode of the podcast That's Absurd, Please Elaborate, which I highly recommend. Unfortunately I can't find the episode right now. https://thatsabsurdshow.com/

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago

Oh boy, have I got good news for you!

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I am not an explosives expert, but I've seen enough YouTube videos about explosives to know that not all explosives explode in fire. Some are incredibly stable at extreme conditions right up until deliberately triggered. It all depends on the type of explosives.

There may still be ways to detect them, but it's not necessarily going to be that simple.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

That's a problem when you get to the fourth.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks, but I hope I won't have to resort to that. I didn't even really try yet, when I reached that fight I only tried it twice and then it was already time for me to go anyway. And I've been procrastinating it ever since. So I didn't give myself a chance yet.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Tunic.

I reached a really difficult fight and I kinda just noped out. Will need to give it a proper go sometime soon.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 237 points 2 weeks ago

Embedded for convenience:

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

Can we make it a rubber duck? I'd like to be able to debug my code at any time.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

That spoiler tag doesn't work (on the web version of Lemmy at least) but good effort

93
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@beehaw.org
 

You might know Robert Miles from his appearances in Computerphile. When it comes to AI safety, his videos are the best explainers out there. In this video, he talks about the developments of the past year (since his last video) and how AI safety plays into it.

For example, he shows how GPT 4 shows understanding of "theory of other minds" where GPT 3.5 did not. This is where the AI can keep track of what other people know and don't know. He explains the Sally-Anne test used to show this.

He covers an experiment where GPT-4 used TaskRabbit to get a human to complete a CAPTCHA, and when the human questioned whether it was actually a robot, GPT-4 decided to lie and said that it needs help because it's blind.

He talks about how many researchers, including high-profile ones, are trying to slow down or stop the development of AI models until the safety research can catch up and ensure that the risks associated with it are mitigated.

And he talks about how suddenly what he's been doing became really important, where before it was mostly a fun and interesting hobby. He now has an influential role in how this plays out and he talks about how scary that is.

If you're interested at all in this topic, I can't recommend this video enough.

 

Or a very very high zoom to get a similar effect.

No real reason for this question, just a random wonder I had. Basically the effect this would have on perspective might be interesting, and I wonder if any movie used this kind of shot for more than a couple of seconds.

 

I know that DNA encodes proteins. Truthfully, everything besides that (including 'what are proteins') mostly wooshes over my head, but that's not relevant because whenever I search this question I never even find it addressed anywhere.

The human body has, among other things, two hands each with five fingers, with a very particular bone structure. How are things like that encoded in DNA, and by what mechanisms does that DNA cause these features to be built the way they are? What makes two people have a different nose shape? Nearly everyone in my family has a mole on the left side of their face, how does that come about from DNA?

I'm sure there are many steps involved, but I don't see how we go from creating proteins to reproducibly building a full organism with all the organs in the right places and the right shapes. Whenever I try to look this up, all of these intermediate steps are missing, so it basically seems like magic.

As I said, any explanation will most likely go over my head and I won't be able to understand it fully, but I at least want to see an explanation. I'll do my best to understand it of course.

 

Hope these kinds of questions are allowed here. On this occasion I'm just looking for a straight answer.

For a university course I need to install ROS - software for doing robotics stuff. Specifically, I need ROS 1 - which is no longer being updated, as ROS 2 is now the focus. The installation instructions are here: https://wiki.ros.org/Installation/Ubuntu

The instructions from the course material say that only Ubuntu 18 would work, though the ROS wiki says Ubuntu 20.04 is the target. Either way, it doesn't seem to be available for Ubuntu 22.04 and therefore Linux Mint 21, which is what I'm running.

The course instructions generally gives 3 options:

  1. Install ROS on a VirtualBox virtual machine
  2. Install on Windows using WSL
  3. Install on a real Ubuntu 18 system

Right now I'm going to use VirtualBox to get started, but I'd really prefer to run it natively and I'm worried about performance. Is there a simple way to download and run software intended for Ubuntu 20.04 on Linux Mint 21.3?

Edit: thank you all for the great suggestions! I got stuck on an unrelated problem (ran out of storage space) but I'm sure your suggestions will work once I fix that. Forgive me for not replying individually, you're all awesome and I don't have anything to add other than "thank you" :)

view more: next ›